Skip to content

Don’t pass this by: Happy 70th birthday, Ringo Starr

July 7, 2010

Close and some cigar: Ringo shows who’s boss as he poses in front of 10 Downing Street with a big fat stogy at the height of his Beatles fame

Yes, that’s right, one of rock ‘n’ roll’s most famous sons has reached his three scores and ten years today. Ringo Starr. Richard Starkey. That one who got a huge ring stuck on his finger in the movie Help. While some cruelly suggest he wasn’t even the best drummer in that rather famous band he played with, it’s undeniable he’s an utter legend in his own lifetime – and for all the right reasons.

He was always the most loveable, carefree and- maybe – most accessible of The Beatles (a bit like a big Liverpudlian teddy bear); married a gorgeous fan in the shape of Maureen Cox and then married a Bond Girl, the drop-dead beautiful former model Barbara Bach (Major Anya Amasova or XXX in 1977’s The Spy Who Loved Me), gave arguably the best performances of all four Fabs in their two iconic films A Hard Day’s Night and Help; and sired another top drummer in son Zak Starkey, who has played with The Who in recent years.

“Ringo was a star in his own right in Liverpool before we even met. He was a professional drummer who sang and performed and had Ringo Starr-time and he was in one of the top groups in Britain but especially in Liverpool before we even had a drummer. So Ringo’s talent would have come out one way or the other as something or other. I don’t know what he would have ended up as, but whatever that spark is in Ringo that we all know but can’t put our finger on — whether it is acting, drumming or singing I don’t know — there is something in him that is projectable and he would have surfaced with or without the Beatles. Ringo is a damn good drummer.” ~ John Lennon, speaking in September 1980

Starr’s post Beatles career hasn’t received anything like the critical acclaim his work with John, Paul and George did – which included vocals on With A Little Help From My Friends, Yellow Submarine, Act Naturally and the three tunes he was involved in writing or penned himself, Don’t Pass Me By, What Goes On and the seemingly universally loved Octopus’s Garden. However, over the decades his own music has developed a strong – and often cult – following, and Ringo himself has ever remained a hugely popular figure the world over. In 2006, following a campaign staged by a British tabloid, he claimed he didn’t want a potential knighthood, but instead wouldn’t mind being made a duke or a prince.

So, here’s to Duke Ringo of Starrdom, 70-not out and still a force for good, old fashioned peace and love. Go on, give the old ‘V’ sign a go right now now and do the man proud – it is his birthday after all…

Handle with dare: World Cup 1986 ~ Argentina versus England

July 6, 2010

Cheat it: Diego Maradonna’s moves were even better than Michael Jackson’s, but when talent failed, cheating sufficed – no surprise as what was really on Argentina’s mind was revenge

Ah, 1986. The year when ill-starred Royal couple Andrew and Fergie married, when Crocodile Dundee showed New York lowlifes what a real knife was, when the space shuttle Challenger exploded in mid-air, and when the 13th World Cup took place in Mexico. The 13th? Yes, that’s right, this tournament – and especially its most memorable match (around which this sixth World Cup special here at George’s Journal will pivot) – certainly proved to be lucky for some, unlucky for others.

However, the all-important need-to-know background to this competition and, in particular, this match dates back another five years, to 1981. And, in part, it involves a figure familiar to followers of a past World Cup blog from yours truly. Yes, our old ‘friend’, General Jorge Videla, self appointed tyrant of Argentina; but don’t worry, it genuinely only involves him in part. That’s because it was in 1981 that the Argentine power at the top switched from Videla to another general, Roberto Viola, and, in turn, later in the year, the military junta that ruled the country was replaced with another, resulting in its third army dictator in succession, General Leopoldi Galtieri. Unfortunately, though, Galtieri was quick to become as infamous on the world stage as Videla. And it was all because he turned his attention to a small group of islands in the South Atlantic.

Economically depressed and suffering from civic unrest, Argentina was under the kosh in the early ’80s and this latest ruling junta was feeling the pressure. So, well aware of its country’s longstanding claim of sovereignty over the nearby Falklands Islands, South Georgia and Sandwich Islands, in spring ’82 the Galtieri government took the decision to invade the islands – first with civilians, then with soldiers – and raise the Argentine flag on South Georgia. This it decided, although potentially leading to war with the the UK (not only owner of the islands, but internationally recognised as such), would stoke up patriotism among the Argentine population, turning its head away from the nation’s domestic problems and lend legitimacy and room for manoeuvre to the new junta. It was an interesting and, ultimately, doomed gamble. For what Galtieri and his cohorts had not counted on was the fortitude and resilience of Britain’s leader, PM Margaret Thatcher.

Relatively new to power herself, Maggie was not yet the immoveable object, let alone the ‘Iron Lady’, political legend has since cast her as. With her deeply unpopular and drastic economic policies beginning to take effect on the UK (tackling inflation, but raising already high unemployment levels), the majority of Britons’ verdict on Thatcher was out; she was far from assured a second term as leader when she would go to the polls – in either ’83 or ’84. However, the Falklands War changed all that.

In love and war: the Mexico ’86 logo (left); Pique, the funky World Cup mascot I adored when I was six years-old (centre); and the Falklands War – serious business back in ’82 (right)

Seizing her opportunity, as the great opportunist she was, she threw all the British armed forces had at the Argentines (army, navy, air force and the SAS) and won the thing within 74 days. Despite 257 losses, Britain’s victory was comprehensive (there were 649 Argentine losses – including 321 on the sunken Belgrano ship alone) and her status as perma-strong, patriot leader was established and her re-election the following year assured – she received a landslide vote. Galtieri and co. were less lucky. Fallout from the Falklands defeat in Argentina saw his junta toppled and, mercifully, democracy swept in to fill the void. Yet, this was still a nation that had lost a war; its national pride had taken a fall. At the hands of the British then, a new wound had been opened in Argentina and the country was hurting…

Four years later in June ’86, though, and it was all smiles. Following South America’s Colombia having to pull out as host, the latest World Cup had instead kicked off up in sunny Mexico, which had been the stage for the classic 1970 tournament – surely a good omen. The world, then, awaited yet another fun-filled festival of football. Well, not just the world, but me too. Yes, at the tender age of six, as I was, this was the first World Cup of which I was aware. Now, I’ll admit, at this blissfully innocent and wonderful point in life I was more interested in catching The Flintstones each evening after the children’s telly had finished on BBC1 (Neighbours wouldn’t fill this slot until later that summer), than I was in keeping abreast of what was going on in the greatest sport on earth’s greatest and latest competition. However, when one day I happened to turn over to ITV instead of watching The Flintstones, I was faced by those two former cornerstones of TV football, Liverpool legend Ian St. John and Spurs supremo Jimmy Greaves, otherwise known as Saint and Greavsie, as they presented their early-evening report on that day’s World Cup goings-on – and thus my introduction to televisual football took place.

Not to say footy on telly and me were a perfect fit immediately, though. This sport seemed a very grown-up and rather rough and tough entity, quite the intoxicating thing to my young mind – a bit like pubs. Not surprising perhaps, considering this was the era of hooliganism; football was some way from the family-fiendly status it’s enjoyed in modern times. In short, I couldn’t quite fathom it. Yet, at the same time I totally grasped the inherent appeal of it – as do many when they first encounter football at the time of a World Cup. Unquestionably then, footy had lit some sort of flame in me; and, no doubt, that had something to do with the fact that, once again, England were taking part.

Setting the pace: the Danes (left) and the Soviets (right) show exciting, surprising early form

Unlike in the previous tournament, but like so many before and since, the English got off to a far from auspicious start. Their first group game against Portugal resulted in a 1-0 loss, their second against Morocco was arguably just as bad, ending 0-0 – yes, they may have gained a draw from it and therefore a point, but through it they lost to a dislocated shoulder their now captain, the utterly rambunctious Bryan Robson, and to a silly red card their vice-captain Ray Wilkins. Looking a busted flush already, former Ipswich manager Bobby Robson’s side required a re-shape… and a miracle.

“We were getting pilloried back home, which is the norm when England don’t start particularly well. But we weren’t really aware of it at the time. We were cocooned in our hotel without any TV that was watchable or even a landline back to the UK, so we were able to focus on our final match. We knew what we had to do – beat Poland to go through,” remembered an England squad member, one Gary Lineker. Aged 26 and top scorer in the First Division the previous season with a brilliant 40 goals for Everton, Lineker had developed a reputation as a great poacher and, leading up to this tournament, England’s most dependable striker. Could he be the one to deliver a miracle in the final group match against old on-the-pitch sparring partner Poland? The answer was emphatic.

Wearing a plaster-cast owing to a broken wrist, as well as the esteemed number 10 shirt, and thanks to his intuitive positional awareness and some decisive attacking football from his team, Lineker struck in the ninth minute, then the 14th, and then the 34th. A first-hat-trick. And an absolutely electric one at that. From being no-hopers that hadn’t mustered a single goal, England – with Lineker lethally leading the line – suddenly looked a dangerous foe for anyone in the second round.

Gratiously, this was the first World Cup in four in which the second round wasn’t a second group stage, but the beginning of the knock-out tournament proper – as it sensibly and entertainingly has been ever since. And joining England there were all the usual suspects. Holders Italy and the impressive looking Argentina qualified from the same group – Italy drawing two matches and winning one; Argentina winning one 2-0 (against Bulgaria) and another 3-1 (against South Korea, in which Italy-based star turn and captain Diego Maradonna grabbed a brace). Brazil made it through with three group victories (and packing stars from four years before Sócrates, Zico and Falcão), dismissing among others a Northern Ireland side sadly unable to match their achievements of ’82. France, who had been a fine side in the last World Cup and were scintillating winners of 1984’s European Championships, were surprisingly outshone in their group by a very attacking Soviet Union (who beat Hungary 6-0), yet they qualified for the next round in a comfortable second place. The two drew 1-1 against each other in a match memorable for a 40-yard screamer scored by the Soviet Vasyl Rats past the French keeper Joel Bats. Rats versus Bats? Yes, you couldn’t make it up.

This tournament – as so many seem to – also featured a ‘group of death’. Who did it contain? Why, West Germany, Denmark, Uruguay and Scotland, of course. Yes, I kid you not, in 1986 this was considered a groupe de mort. Mind you, it proved to be a stonker, not least because Denmark, not West Germany, progressed from it with a 100 percent record. The dynamic Danes beat Scotland 1-0, the Germans 2-0 and routed Uruguay 6-1. Impressive stuff and no mistake. For their part, the Scots gave it a go, what with spunky little midfielder Gordon Strachan opening the scoring against West Germany (the latter eventually winning 2-1), but not managing to win a game, it was they who went home early and the Germans who happily went through in second place behind Denmark.

What the football gods had given the Danes in their first three matches, they took away in their fourth, however. Yup, they crashed out – and, believe it or not, to those perennial World Cup under-performers Spain, with Real Madrid star Emilio Butragueño grabbing four goals in a 5-1 win. Elsewhere, in an absolute cracker, Belgium shocked everyone by defeating the Soviet Union 4-3 after extra-time – Soviet striker Ihor Belanov scored a hat-trick, but conspired to end up on the losing side – while Brazil beat Poland 4-0; France knocked out Italy 2-0; Argentina defeated Uruguay 1-0; and the Three Lions roared again, marching past Paraguay 3-0, with Lineker getting another two goals and his front-line partner, Liverpool’s skillful Peter Beardsley, the other. For many, though, the highlight of the round was host Mexico’s 2-0 victory over Bulgaria, thanks to an unforgettable goal scored via a scissor-kick from Manuel Negrete Arias.

Spitting image: ITV’s fun football pundits Saint and Greavsie were in their prime during Mexico ’86 (left), just as was France ace – and present UEFA chief – Michel Platini (right)

For the most part, the next round, the quarter finals, weren’t the most exciting – certainly in terms of goals. Three of the four matches ended in draws and had to be settled by penalties. Germany versus Mexico finished scoreless, with the former winning the shoot-out; Spain equalized against Belgium on 85 minutes, but lost 5-4 on spot-kicks; while, in an admittedly entertaining match, the brilliant Zico missed an easy chance and had a penalty in normal-time saved, as his side drew 1-1 against France. The latter’s goal came from their talismanic captain Michel Platini, on his birthday, and he too missed a penalty, this time in the shoot-out. Yet, with another miss during the old 18-yard box lottery from Brazilian Sócrates, it was the French who finally did the business, by four penalties to three.

The fourth quarter final, however, was a match unlike the others. In fact, it was unlike any match in this World Cup – and unlike many matches in any World Cup. Indeed, it was the game that, come the end, this entire tournament seemed to revolve around. At the tender age I was then, I guess it was the first football match I ever actually watched – and, given it was England against Argentina, The Flintstones it was not.

Thanks to the notoriously ill-tempered match between the two in the ’66 World Cup, sporting bad-blood already existed between England and Argentina. However, the hostilities, casualties and result of the Falklands War lent this fixture another dynamite dimension. It was four years since the war and, of course, the English public had far from forgotten it, but as a country beginning to be bouyed by a resurgent economy driven by the City of London and as the victors of the aforementioned conflict, this footballing clash was more about extra spice than some sort of a re-match. For the Argentine public, however, anticipation for the game was different – it was more like awaiting an Olympic meeting contested by the USA or the USSR at the height of the Cold War. Indeed, following the match, Diego Maradonna commented: “Although we had said before the game that football had nothing to do with the Malvinas [Falklands] War, we knew they had killed a lot of Argentine boys there, killed them like little birds. And this was [about] revenge”.

Magic moment: Maradonna on his way to scoring his sensational second against England

The two teams went off at half-time even-steven – Argentina had had the better of it, but hadn’t managed to breach England’s defence. All was to change in the second-half, though. And on 51 minutes, the first of two utterly unforgettable moments occurred. Having started a move, Maradonna ran on deep into the England half, expecting a one-two from striker Jorge Valdano. The ball, however, came back to him from a skewed clearance from England midfielder Steve Hodge, looping up ahead of the diminutive player. England’s 6′ 1″ goalkeeper – and captain for the match – Peter Shilton rose to punch the ball clear, while the 5′ 5″ Maradonna jumped towards it too. Surely the latter’s jump was in vain? Apparently not. The ball bounced away from the two of them and into the England net. The referee, Tunisian Ali Bin Nasser, blew his whistle and awarded the goal. 1-0 to Argentina. But, suddenly, Shilton raced towards him, tapping his arm, flagrently indicating that his opponent had, in fact, handled the ball and that the goal shouldn’t stand. Quickly catching wind of what Shilton was saying, other England players began to crowd around the referee and claim the same. Yet, the referee – and his relevant linesman – hadn’t seen the infringement and so would hear nothing of it: the goal stood. Instant TV replays from a reverse angle backed up England’s cause – with bells on. Maradonna had deliberately – and cutely – fisted the ball a split-second before Shilton could reach it.

Four minutes later, though, the Argentina number 10 created another incredible moment – this time one of utter magic. Picking up the ball in his own half, he went on a 10-second, 60-metre run, beating four England players as he did, and finished it off by placing it past Shilton and putting his side two goals clear. In the years since, many observers have claimed this to be the ‘goal of the century’ or, plainly, the best ever scored. It may be. Such a thing is very difficult to quantify to my mind. What is undeniable, though, is that it was a piece of otherworldly skill – and, ironically and bittersweetly, in direct contrast to the moment that directly preceded it.

After two such extraordinary moments, one would be forgiven for thinking that Argentina were now out of sight, that England were dead and buried. Were they ever, though. Showing the smart and tactically-aware manager he was, Bobby Robson made a double substitution and brought on two exciting players in the shape of Chris Waddle and Liverpool superstar John Barnes. Sparked into life by this change, England gave it a real go and started to press and attack themselves – midfielder Glenn Hoddle soon went close with a free-kick. Then, in the 80th minute, John Barnes rampaged down the left and delivered an acute cross into the penalty area that Lineker deftly headed in – it was his sixth goal of the tournament. Another Barnes cross seven minutes later caused further panic for the Argentines when Lineker nearly reached it again, but this time it was not to be. And, in the end, so proved the match for England. They lost 2-1 – that late goal, though they were beaten, ensuring Maradonna’s moment of blatant cheating had proved critical; his brilliant goal would not alone have been enough to defeat them.

“Un poco con la cabeza de Maradona y otro poco con la mano de Dios” (“A little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God”) ~ Diego Maradonna shares with the world how his cheating goal against England was scored, and so the ‘Hand of God’ reference is born

Immediately following the game, England defender Terry Butcher was required to give a urine example for routine drug-testing, along with Maradonna. Meeting the man during the process, he asked him whether he’d used his head or hand to score the first goal; the reply being the head. Butcher, an ardently competitive and patriotic sportsman, has since claimed that if Maradonna had admitted to him he’d cheated, he’s not sure what he would have done to him. And, somewhat less courageously, that’s exactly what the Argentine admitted to the world’s media minutes later – suggesting the ‘hand of God’ had been involved in the scoring of the goal. Bobby Robson knew his mind all right, though, claiming instead it was the ‘hand of a rascal’ what had scored it. Maradonna has also since admitted that immeditaly following the hand-ball he urged his teammates to hug him, otherwise the referee may not have allowed it.

All the same, there was no getting away from it, a decent England team – the first since the defending champions of 1970 – were out; the Argentines were through to the semi-finals. Less controversially, they beat Belgium 2-0 there (Maradonna scoring another outstanding goal in that match) and West Germany, the efficient, well-oiled machine of this era they were, beat the star-studded French 2-0 as well. And so to the final, and quite the exciting match it was too. Argentina took the lead after just nine minutes through defender José Brown, and Valdano added another in the 55th. However, the Germans had other ideas, what with veteran midfield powerhouse Karl-Heinz Rummenige scoring in the 74th minute and striker Rudi Völler grabbing an equalizer on 80 minutes. Yet just three minutes later, and thanks to a pass from the ubiquitous Maradonna, Jorge Burruchaga sealed the deal and got the winner. For the second time in their history then – in fact, the second time in three World Cups – Argentina were champions.

It’s little surprise that in the years since, this  World Cup has generated much debate – all of it, seemingly, pivoting around that England-Argentina match and those two moments from Maradonna. To my mind, his performance in Mexico ’86 and, especially, his second goal in that game has ensured he must be considered one of the greatest footballers ever to have played the game (perhaps he’s even second only to Pelé himself). Yet, that’s only one side of the coin and can only ever be viewed as such. Maradonna had dark moments in his career both at international and club level following this World Cup, but just on its own his first goal in that match in question tempers all else he achieved in that tournament. All these years later, I’ve never been able to get away from the conclusion I came to as a six year-old at the time – for all his God-given talent, Diego the little devil was a plain and simple cheat.

Golden boy: England’s six-goal hero and new national treasure, the one and only Gary Lineker lifts a paper – if not World – cup following his hat-trick against Poland

Overall though, this World Cup probably wasn’t a bad ‘un, it’s only fair to say – not the classic of 1970 that Mexico also staged, but it was never going to match that one, surely? And it did offer a couple of silver linings too. Not only did Belgium pull off the incredible coup of finishing fourth (when are they next going to repeat that feat, honestly?), but England’s Lineker proved himself Gary the Great and the nation’s favourite son by finishing the tournament’s top scorer and thereby winning its Golden Boot – the first, and so far, only Englishman to have done so in a World Cup.

But after all my thoughts and words, what is the take on this World Cup by its winners? Well, you may be a little surprised, because according to former player Roberto Perfumo (whose international career ended in 1974): “In 1986, winning that game against England was enough. Winning the World Cup was secondary for us. Beating England was our real aim”. Things that occur in World Cups often make you think, but surely that opinion offers a huge chop of Argentine-beef food for thought…

Listen, my friends! ~ July

July 1, 2010
tags: , ,

In the words of Moby Grape… listen, my friends! Yes, it’s the (hopefully) monthly playlist presented by George’s Journal just for you good people.

There may be one or two classics to be found here dotted in among different tunes you’re unfamiliar with or never heard before – or, of course, you may’ve heard them all before. All the same, why not sit back, listen away and enjoy…

Click on the song titles to hear them

~~~

The Youngbloods ~ Get Together

Donovan ~ Barabajagal (Love Is Hot)

The Band ~ I Shall Be Released

Julie London ~  Light My Fire

Burt Bacharach ~ South American Getaway

Paul McCartney ~ Maybe I’m Amazed

The Rolling Stones*  ~ Happy/ Let It Loose

Edgar Wright Group ~ Free Ride

War ~ Low Rider

Justin Hayward ~ Forever Autumn

Madonna ~ Borderline

David Bowie ~ Underground

~~~

* Yes, that’s right, a Stones double bill here from the legendary Exile On Main St. album – in honour of the recent documentary film on its making, Stones In Exile, no less. I know, I know, I spoil you, but you’re most welcome…

Blue steal: World Cup 1982 ~ Italy v Brazil

June 30, 2010

Assured azzurro?: Italy’s Paolo Rossi pursued by Brazil’s Sócrates in one of the all-time classic World Cup matches that would prove a critical turning point in 82’s terrific tournament

So, if you’re of an English persuasion like me, you’ll no doubt still be down in the mouth and in need of a tonic to get over the so-called Three Lions’ ignominious exit from South Africa at the weekend. And what better tonic could there be than to look back on this exceptional tournament and, in detail, its greatest match, in this, my fifth World Cup special? Well, short of throwing oneself into the smuggery of Wimbledon, I can’t think of a better one anyway.

Now, for some odd reason, the 1982 World Cup seems rather ignored or even forgotten when compared to its fellow illustrious football tournaments of times past. And that’s a shame, seems to me, because this one was an out-and-out crackerjack. Perhaps, over here in the UK at least, that has something to do with it taking place in the early ’80s. Before the rise of the yuppie, the invention of the brick-like mobile phone and Stock, Aitken and Waterman’s culpability for almost every song that found its way into the charts, the ’80s weren’t exactly a very colourful, optimistic or even an ‘us and them’ divisive time. Indeed, the early years of that decade were – perhaps predictably – far more like a continuation of the previous one and, thus, not too fondly recalled nowadays.

The fact was the policies – for better and worse – of new Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher hadn’t really bitten Britain yet and no single demographic of the population was clearly feeling the effect of 1979’s Tory election victory. In which case, money was tight for pretty much everyone as the economy was still far from bouyant, unemployment was high (although it would only rise in the next few years, of course), and civil unrest had reared its ugly head once more.

Famously, in April 1981, a day-and night-long violent riot had taken place in Brixton, a very multicultural borough of South London, thanks to the the area’s crime rate having grown rapidly owing to a recent rise in unemployment. The rioters, who were white as well as black, were initially angered by the sudden surge in police presence and its heavy-handed stop-and-search policy. Time Magazine referred to the event as ‘Bloody Saturday’, an allusion to the so-called ‘Bloody Sunday’ in Belfast at the height of ‘The Troubles’ in the early ’70s. Less well remembered is that in the same year similar riots had also broken out in Birmingham, Liverpool, Bristol, Leeds, Leicester, Coventry and Edinburgh, among other cities. Culturally, the feel of urban decay and despair seemed to be reflected through song with the ska-flavoured Ghost Town by The Specials and the driving punk-pop London Calling by The Clash, both of which were big chart hits of the era. The ’70s were over, but the country still seemed to lack direction then; it still felt like a sleeping giant that couldn’t quite pull itself up and forwards – and it desperately needed to.

Picasso and fiasco: World Cup ’82’s poster, inspired by the work of Spain’s greatest artist; tournament mascot Naranjito; and violence on the streets of London’s Brixton in 1981

In many ways, the same could be said for the England team that qualified for the World Cup of Summer ’82, held in Spain – although they were the first to do so in eight years. Indeed, the team even wore skin-tight shirts with bad patterns on them and very short shorts (or strangely iconic ’80s sportwear, if you prefer), just like every man on the street of Britain seemed to wear in early ’80s summers. And manager Ron Greenwood’s men hardly seemed like glamorous world-beaters either. Instead of 1966’s Charlton, Hurst, Moore and Banks, the class of ’82 boasted the likes of Francis, Wilkins, Brooking and an injury-carrying Kevin Keegan. Oh, and a promising young lad named Bryan Robson.

Ah, Bryan Robson. In actuality, it wasn’t the perma-permed Keegan, but this midfielder with energy and endeavour comparable to that of a Duracell bunny who turned out to be England’s talisman this tournament. And he hit the front as soon as 27 seconds into the side’s campaign, putting them 1-0 up against the much fancied France (packing the terrific Michel Platini and others) in their opening game. Impressively, this goal was to rank the fastest in World Cup history for the next 20 years. And come the 67th minute, Robson grabbed another – undeniably, a new star was born on the international stage – and thanks to a late strike from Paul Mariner, England won 3-1 and were off to a great start.

Indeed, with a further 2-0 win over Czechoslovakia and 1-0 win over Kuwait, in both of which striker Trevor Francis scored, England cruised through to the second group stage with a rare 100 percent record. Unlikely it may have seemed, but they were doing all right, better than all right, actually. Could they, as promised in their official tournament song, really ‘get it right this time’? Of seemingly less interest at this stage, France also made it through the group in second place.

Actually, as if to kick some juice into the ’80s, right from the off and all over the shop this was an exciting World Cup. The tournament had, in fact, opened with an Argentina-Belgium fixture – surely a bog-standard victory for the former, the reigning champions? Erm, well, no as it turned out. Having underestimated their rivals, the Argentines fell to an embarassing 1-0 defeat. Still, along with the Belgians they did manage to progress to the next round. Almost as impressively, the other highlight of this group was the match between its two minnows, Hungary and El Salvador, which was won to the tune of 10-1 by the former, surely reminding their nation of the fine side it possessed back in the ’50s. This crazy scoreline is still the joint second highest ever achieved in the competition’s history.

Burly start, curly non-stalwart: Bryan Robson scores his first goal against France; Kevin Keegan struggles and, inset, the fashion statement that was the World Cup ’82 England shirt

Elsewhere, the mighty West Germany’s opener produced another unexpected result, beaten, as they were, 2-1 by Algeria – the first ever African victory in a World Cup. Erstwhile and efficient as ever, mind, the Germans did make it through to the next stage, but not without controversy. In their final game of the round, they faced Austria (with whom they’d shared an infamous match in the ’74 contest) and the two teams, knowing they’d both go through if West Germany won 1-0, completely shut up shop and kicked the ball around in a strange unspoken agreement as soon as the former scored a goal early in the first half. The Spanish-majority crowd, TV audiences around the world and even the fans of the two countries were appalled by this behaviour – disgusted, a German fan in the stadium even burned his nation’s flag. How could this have happened?

Well, just as in the immediately previous World Cup when Argentina had managed to get through to the final with a dubious defeat of Peru, this match had taken place after all the others in the group had been played so both teams knew exactly what they needed to do in the game. This sort of thing needed stamping out once and for all, and finally in the next tournament FIFA ensured such an unfair advantage wouldn’t take place again, but clearly the desire to act had come not one, but two, World Cups too late.

There were three more groups in the first round this year (yes, that’s six in all) and, in spite of the three mentioned so far, none of them generated more surprise than the one in which Italy found itself. At the beginning of this tournament, it wasn’t so much Forza Italia as For goodness sake, Italia. In an occurence that, incredibly, would be repeated 24 years later in 2006, going into the contest the Italian domestic game had been rocked to its very roots by a huge match-fixing scandal across its top league Serie A. So bad had the debacle been that the clubs AC Milan and Lazio had been relegated to Serie B in punishment, while major players had served suspensions, including star striker Paolo Rossi who had been dished out with a two-season ban (even though evidence that’s since come to light suggests he may have been innocent).

All the same, to all intents and purposes the 1980 Totonero had surely provided the Azzurri with the worst possible preparation for this World Cup, and that appeared to be proved so in their opening group when, shamefully as far as their compatriots were concerned, they scraped through to the second round by the skin of their teeth, drawing 0-0 with Poland, 1-1 with Peru and 1-1 with Cameroon. In fact, the Africans were only denied the place that went to the Italians because they had scored one goal less, tied on points as they were. This was despite the fact the former had had a perfectly good goal from striker Roger Milla disallowed against Peru. In great contrast to Italy, Poland put five past Peru and qualified for the next round by topping the table. Indeed, the Poles were bolstered by the now legendary striker-from-midfield Grzegorz Lato appearing in his third consecutive World Cup – unsurprisingly, he was one of those who’d got on the scoresheet against the Peruvians. Rossi, meanwhile, hadn’t come close to a sniff in his three matches and, famously, the Italian media is supposed to have referred to him as a ghost wandering aimlessly over the field.

The pluck of the Irish: Northern Ireland defeat Spain (left) thanks to a strike from hero Gerry Armstrong (right)

Wandering aimlessly through the first group stage had been the preserve of the home nations in recent World Cups, but, like England, another UK representative had a cracking time of it – frankly, to the utter shock of the footballing world and, in particular, the hosts. Northern Ireland had qualified for the ’82 tournament – their first in 32 years – and following plucky draws against Yugoslavia (0-0) and Honduras (1-1), they did the unthinkable, yes, thanks to a single goal they beat Spain… in Spain… in Spain’s World Cup. An amazing feat that saw them through to the next round by incredibly topping the group. The Spanish, a disappointing team in their home World Cup, joined them there with a record of one win, one draw and that one loss against the Northern Irish.

If luck was going the home nations’ way elsewhere, then, perhaps predictably, it didn’t rub off on the Scots. Through to their third Cup in a row, they – like everybody else in their group – demolished New Zealand and claimed a fighting draw against the Soviet Union, but that result wasn’t good enough and saw them cruelly go out – yet again – on goal difference. However, in truth, this group was only really about one team. Indeed, the entire early stages of the tournament were only really about one team… Brazil. Yes, that’s right, Esquadrão de Ouro were back, and, indeed, they did appear to be a golden squad once more.

For they had captain, midfield maestro and eventual cult figure Sócrates, who was as much loved for his terrific beard as for his silky skills (and for sharing his name with Ancient Greece’s pre-eminent philosopher, of course); they had the goalscoring machine that was Zico (also, in fact, a midfielder rather than a striker – well, he was Brazilian, after all); they had another outstanding midfielder in the shape of the marvellous Falcão; they had the left-winger with a beautiful touch Éder; and, finally, they had the very useful striker Serginho. Just like back in 1970 when they’d last won the thing, the Brazilians looked the real deal, displaying footballing ability and clinical finishing unlike any other side thus far. They defeated the decent Soviets 2-1, beat up Scotland 4-1 and put another four past New Zealand without reply; Zico scoring three, Serginho two, Éder another two and Falcão yet another two in the process. To say by the end of the opening group stage they were favourites for the tournament would be like saying cameramen traditionally like lingering on on bikini-clad Brazilian female fans dancing in the stands. World Cup ’82 was well and truly rocking already, and to an undeniable samba beat.

Puzzlingly, unlike in the last two World Cups where the second group stage had comprised two groups of four teams, this one’s second round of groups comprised four of three teams. Three may be a magic number, but it’s an odd number for a group in a football contest, surely. However, this change did ensure that the winners of each of the new groups – four of them, of course – would go through to a pair of semi-finals, which had been blessedly reinstated after going AWOL in the ’74 and ’78 tournaments, so perhaps there was some actual method to the madness. Talking of methods, having applied a successful one to their first group, the Poles did exactly the same to their new one (the first of the second round), beating Belgium 3-0 as they did, thanks to a hat-trick from hot-to-trot striker Zbigniew Boniek, and drawing against the Soviet Union. After their previous heroics, Belgium, a little sadly, weren’t to go any further; conversely, Poland were the first side through to the semis.

And joining them there – you guessed it – were West Germany. The nation who, by now, was really making a habit of being there or thereabouts in every football contest in which it participated, got the better of both the pretty woeful Spain and, yes, England. The Germans beat Spain 2-1 and drew 0-0 with England (hardly a match that latter one, then, to rival the clashes of ’66 and ’70). For their part, England also picked up another 0-0 draw with the hosts. In the end, injuries – in particular to the man who perhaps could have delivered the goods for them, the Superstars superstar himself Kevin Keegan – had caught up with the English this campaign, but they did have the (in)glorious honour of returning home having not lost a game.

In contrast, the side who England had so impressively beaten in their first match, France, cruised through their second group, beating Austria 1-0 and Northern Ireland 4-1. This second stage was clearly a step too far for the otherwise terrific Northern Irish, but they’d had a legendary tournament and could boast one of its top scorers in three-goal hero Gerry Armstrong, who – given his team had defeated the hosts – would somewhat ironically switch Watford for Real Mallorca the following year. As Jimmy Greaves had a wont to say once upon a time, football really is a funny old game.

The final group of this World Cup was unquestionably what the media would nowadays dub ‘the group of death’, containing, as it did, Brazil, Italy and Argentina. The latter of those three were, of course, the World Cup holders, but losing as they already had to Belgium, they weren’t the team of four years before (not least because they didn’t possess the huge home support they had enjoyed in their home country then). They fell first to a 2-1 defeat to Italy – the latter’s goals coming from decent-looking midfielder Marco Tardelli and left-back Antonio Cabrini – and then to a 3-1 defeat to Brazil – for whom Zico and Serginho again scored. Those results ensured that the Argentines were out of it and it now all came down to the Brazil-Italy clash to decide the final semi-finalist. And what a clash it turned out to be. In a word, it was incredible.

Dream team: Brazil’s Falcão, Zico and Serginho in action – but could they win the World Cup?

Not that, before kick-off, it looked like it was going to be that much of a contest, of course – Brazil were the undoubted pre-match favourites. Yet, lest we forget, in addition to its importance as a decider of a semi-final place, this match also saw these two great footballing nations clash for the first time in a meaningful World Cup tie since the classic 1970 final. And, just as then, it was those in green and gold who held all the artistic aces, beginning the game, as they did, with the sort of skill, style and flambouyance  they’d shown throughout this tournament. In answer to this, the Italians looked set to rely on an old favourite of theirs, catenaccio – the smart, if not arty, tactic of playing defensively (indeed, catenaccio translates from the Italian as ‘door-bolt’) – a method of play dreamt up and used very effectively by Inter Milan in the ’60s to scoop up Scudetto after Scudetto. In actual fact though, the system Italy used in this World Cup was a slightly modernised, more flexible version that has become known as zona mista (‘mixed zone’) – and, make no mistake, the boys in blue used it in this match with bells on.

The first indication that the game wasn’t going to go to the script – or even go to the form of either side so far – was unmistakeable: Paolo Rossi scored a goal. The event took place just five minutes into play too, when the much-maligned marksman nodded in a cross from Cabrini, showing the true poaching instincts that had made him such a star in his homeland years before and which had so far eluded him so clearly this competition. True to their instincts as a good Brazilian side though, the samba boys didn’t panic and played their natural easy-on-the-eye and, when necessary, powerful and decisive football – and got what they deserved in the 17th minute when a marvellous move culminated in Sócrates brilliantly striking home at the Italian keeper’s near post. 1-1. This was shaping up to be a good contest. And it got better.

Just three minutes later, stepping past a defender and intercepting a loose pass across the other penalty area, an utterly reinvigorated Rossi lashed home a shot into the Brazilian net, putting his side back into the lead. 2-1. If the Brazilians were stunned by going behind again – and to Rossi again – they didn’t show it. Instead, they bombarded their opponents’ half of the pitch and bore down on the opposing penalty area for much of the remainder of the match. However, owing to the Italians’ drilled organisation and, in particular, the exceptional work of central defenders Claudio Gentile and Gaetino Scirea, the South Americans just couldn’t get through. The passes, interplay, shots, strikes, volleys and venom from the Brazilians were no good, the Azzurri were standing firm – and conducting an admirable masterclass in how perfectly to counteract such great forward play. Indeed, Gentile had been charged the unenviable task of man-marking Zico and so good did he do it he picked up a yellow card for his efforts, but Brazil’s irresistible Number 10 neither scored a goal nor set up another the entire match.

Finally, however, the fabulous Falcão did find a way through the Italian resistance when he scored from a full 20 yards out in the 68th minute, the delight and relief etched on his face as he celebrated with his teammates – at 2-2, Brazil would now be through to the last four on goal difference; the Italians out. But someone had other ideas. And who was it? That’s right, you guessed it. Popping up in the Brazilian box just six minutes later and connecting as quick as lightning to a poor clearance from his side’s corner, that man Rossi sealed an amazing hat-trick, sending his team 3-2 in front and, yes, into the semi-finals.

Keeper’s KO: Harald Schumacher crashes into Patrick Battiston in the second semi-final

Over the years, many have decried this match owing to it sending such a brilliant Brazilian side out of the World Cup. Indeed, the BBC’s John Motson has claimed his co-commentator for the game Bobby Charlton cried at the end of it for that very reason. Yet, there’s always two sides in a football match, and there’s often two ways of playing one – and this match showed up both in their equally fascinating extremes. While Brazil played near-fantasy football in this World Cup, the style the Italians played was (arguably) just as impressive, more effective and ultimately smarter. Their defensive counter-moves to Brazil’s forward-efforts were brilliant in their own way and their break-away counter-attacking (now such a recognisable and welcome part of modern football the world over) was thrilling, decisive and winning. There’s a reason why it took Brazil 24 years to win their next World Cup after the beautiful triumph of 1970; until 1994 they didn’t play defensively – or, if you like, smartly – enough to do so. It was perhaps this very match that taught them the lesson that free-flowing, fluid, forward-dominated football wasn’t enough to conquer the world anymore; you needed to be smart like the Italians too.

And lucky as well, it should be said. For in their semi-final the latter met the Poles, who, having had a great tournament thus far, really didn’t perform and against an Italy that had just found its form – fortuitously? – at the right time went down 2-0. Both goals came from Rossi. Italy too were perhaps lucky they didn’t face either side that contested the other semi-final, two true European powerhouses in the sport at this time, France and West Germany. And, make no mistake, this particular meeting made for another stonker of a match.

The drama began as early as the 17th minute when German midfielder Pierre Littbarski opened the scoring, only for his goal to be negated by a Michel Platini penalty in the 26th. Platini was involved again in the second half’s – and probably the entire match’s – most memorable moment when his fine pass put defender Patrick Battiston through on goal, only for German keeper Harald Schumacher to come racing out and… not clear the ball, but miss it completely as he delibarately floored the unrushing Frenchman. Play was halted for several minutes while the unconscious Battiston was stretchered off the pitch, the result of which being that neither a penalty was awarded nor was Schumacher sent off, the referee deeming the assault not even to have been a foul. For his sins, the coolly gum-chewing, shockingly permed German keeper took the goal-kick and the game resumed. At least after the match he offered to pay Battiston’s dental bill when it was revealed he’d knocked two of the poor feller’s teeth out, although one may say that was adding insult to literal injury.

Into extra-time the match went then and on 92 minutes, French sweeper Marius Trésor volleyed home to make it 2-1 and six minutes later his teammate Alain Giresse finished a swift counter-attack to put their side two goals clear. But you can never count out the Germans, oh but you can’t. On 102 minutes they themselves scored following a counter-attack through Bayern Munich’s European Footballer of the Year, German squad captain and very recent substitute Karl-Heinz Rumenigge, while in the 108th a terrific move was topped off by a volley into the net in the form of a bicycle kick from Klaus Fischer (since voted German football’s greatest ever goal). The scores were level once more then at 3-3, and that meant… penalties. Of course, penalty shoot-outs to decide knock-out matches in international football are ten-a-penny nowadays, but back in 1982 they were a great rarity. Thus, this fatalistic, sado-masochistic manner to decide a winner merely seemed to lend this epic match a fittingly über-dramatic climax. And, predictably, it was the Germans who proved the über penalty-takers, winning the shootout as they did – as they always seem to.

Abiding memories: Paolo Rossi scores – again – in the final (left); Marco Tardelli’s explosive and utterly unforgettable goal celebration (right)

So, Italy versus West Germany in the final. It had a nice ring to it and, as if this World Cup hadn’t had enough already, it proved to be yet another memorable, quality match. Save a missed penalty from Italian Cabrini, the game was goalless and honours even going into the second half – and that’s when it really sparked into life. And who was it who provided the spark? Who else could it be now but Paolo Rossi, as in the 57th minute he headed in a low cross at very close range. Having mastered their zona mistra system against the Brazilians, the Azzurri now struck gold with it against the Germans. The latter were clearly knackered from their huge semi-final exploits against the French, while their far sprightlier opponents wre defending superbly (especially Gentile and Scirea again), which ensured they could counter-attack and apply the sucker-punch – not once, but twice. First, on 69 minutes Tardelli scored from range to put Italy two clear, then substitute striker Alessandro Altobelli sealed the win twelve minutes later following a great solo run from Conti down the wing. Paul Breitner managed to pull one back in the 83rd minute for the Germans (impressively, his second goal in two World Cup finals, as he’d already scored a penalty in the ’74 final), but it was scant consolation. The boys in blue had done it – they’d won the World Cup for the third time in their history.

And, following the terrible match-fixing scandal that had preceded their tournament and the frankly terrible start they’d made to it, it was rather a remarkable win for them too (indeed, as hinted at earlier, the whole thing seemed to repeat itself for Italy as they went into, competed in and eventually won the 2006 World Cup – bizarre really). Not just that, though. Having been a laughing stock right up until his side’s third match from the end, Rossi finished the contest as top scorer with six goals, ensuring he picked up not just the Golden Boot, but also the newly introduced Golden Ball award for the tournament’s best overall player. Not bad going for an aimless ghost.

Perhaps this terrific tournament’s most enduring memory, though, is the celebration of Marco Tardelli as he scored Italy’s second – and decisive – goal in the final. Raising his hands in clenched fists, his mouth opening into a square and his eyes widening, he sprinted away along the pitch and towards his team’s bench, completely lost in the ectasy and majesty of the moment. And, you’ve got to say, it’s an image that fits this tournament like a glove, one of the most entertaining, exciting, colourful, controversial, crazy and unpredictable sporting contests there’s ever been. Yes, it was 1982 and it may have been drab in Britain, but this World Cup and all its components had surely afforded the country – and the world – something of a taster of the extraodinary decade that was to come…

Shining a light on a loose masterpiece: Stones In Exile (2010) ~ Review

June 5, 2010

Soul survivors: Mick and Keith during the making of Exile On Main St. – for once the two seem without booze, maybe that’s why Mick’s face suggests Keith’s playing a bum note

Whichever way you wrap it, 1972’s Exile On Main St. has always been the oddest of their great gifts The Rolling Stones have bestowed on us over the decades. A double album that was crafted during the period the band should surely have slowed down following their spiritual leader Brian Jones’ death in 1969, it’s also stripped back, bluesy and hopelessly loose – just when you’d have thought they’d have retreated into the safe embrace of studio technology and trickery, instead of taking the seemingly harder and more dangerous route of going back-to-basics. Plus, for all its (rightfully) accumulated acclaim over the years, the album only contains one tune that turned out to be a genuine hit single.

Yes, it’s always been a bit of a curate’s egg – if one of which exquisite trinket maker Carl Fabergé would have been proud. So, good news it is then that the brand spanking new 61-minute documentary that looks at the album’s making, Stones In Exile, goes a damned good way to explaining why.

As if in keeping with the undiluted, rather shambolic genesis and ethos behind the album in question, this docu film, directed by Stephen Kijak, was both premiered at the Cannes Film Festival and shown on BBC1 in the UK last month, at almost exactly the same time. A bit weird to my mind that, I must say. Still, it did mean I didn’t have to worry about having to rub shoulders with the movers and shakers on the Promenade in the vain hope I may get hold of a ticket from a tout – no, instead I could watch the whole thing at home in the comfort of my favourite armchair and with a nice cup of coffee. Who could ask for more? Well, going to Cannes would have been cool, I guess.

Exile On Main St.‘s origins were not promising; in fact, they were downright ominous. Owing to businessman Allen Klein (who was famously involved in screwing up The Beatles’ finances, which helped bring about their demise) sticking his finger into The Stones’ money matters towards the end of the ’60s, following the legendary Andrew Loog Oldham’s departure as their manager, the band were facing financial – as well as legal – problems. And problems that  for a rock ‘n’ roll band, which at the time was undisputedly living the archetypal rock ‘n’ roll lifestyle, were seemingly too complex and difficult to get their heads around.

Let It Loose: As he says in the film, Keith proves he was more ‘roll’ and Mick more ‘rock’ during the recording of Exile On Main St. – but a hell of a smack was about to hit him 

Basically, it boiled down to the fact that the four main members of The Stones hadn’t paid tax for several years and were required to clear their debts with the Inland Revenue as quickly as possible. However, there was another problem. Britain’s finances too were in a mess at this time and UK residents at the highest end of the wage earning scale, as The Stones were now, were required to pay as much as 97 percent in the pound (£) to the taxman. In short, living and working in Blighty, the band actually couldn’t make enough money quickly enough to pay the state back what they owed. There was one solution, therefore – leave the country and set up home elsewhere. As it happened, guitarist Keith Richards and his German actress wife Anita Pallenberg, fresh with a toddler daughter, had just started renting out a sixteen-room mansion called Nellcôte on the seafront of Villefranche-sur-Mer, not from Nice on the French Riviera. France it was for The Stones then.

However, perhaps surprisingly for peeps who had become well accustomed to jet-setting here, there and everywhere by now, leaving Britain behind was a bind for the band. And covered nicely in the film is this point, for while drummer Charlie Watts mentions that moving country naturally meant there was a language barrier to tackle, guitarist Bill Wyman recalls he had to have all his favourite British food sent over – you could get hold of PG Tips that way, all right, but you still had to contend with French milk. The band quickly decided their next money-making venture would be an album and, without any studios to meet their requirements in the south of France, they opted for the next best thing. Oddly, this turned out to be attempting to record the thing at Richards’ villa. It was probably one of those ideas that sounded brilliant at the time. Over a bottle of Jack Daniels. The trouble was they quickly discovered that it would be completely impractical to play and record in the house’s large ballroom, as they had planned. This ensured that recording would have to take place throughout the dank and dirty cubby hole-like rooms that made up the mansion’s basement. To say this arrangement wasn’t ideal would be a gross understatement.

Using a mixture of anecdotes from those involved, archive filmed footage, music from the album and photography captured by a snapper who had turned up at the villa before everyone else merely to get a few shots of Richards and Pallenberg, but instead stayed the entire summer, the documentary does a fine job of getting across the totally disorganised, haphazard and frankly nuts recording work that went on at Nellcôte. In truth, it was like one long jam-session that went on alongside a months-long party. As frontman Mick Jagger admits, they could get away with doing it because they were young – surely no music artist over the age of 30 and in their right mind would consider recording an album that way. Indeed, it’s unlikely any music artist would be able to get away with recording an album that way nowadays at all. Still, somehow – and despite all the distractions – The Stones magically pulled it off. And, boy, were there distractions too.

Booze, drugs, wives, kids and numerous hangers-on (besides saxophonist Billy Keys and manager Jimmy Miller) were everywhere. The film effectively suggests the album was almost secondary to the party. Yet – and for me this is sadly where Stones In Exile pulls its punches somewhat – it doesn’t really get into the nitty-gritty of what really went on. Yes, we learn that only some musicians were around some of the time, and when there they’d jam and play day or night (whenever they were awake, often); and that the music from the basement was so loud that it could be heard from the beach, but curiously none of the neighbours complained; and that everyone would eat together for lunch prepared by cook ‘Fat Jacques’; but the more juicy, controversial stuff, which clearly went on, is rather glossed over. The closest we really get to it is being told that the band members’ kids pretty much fulfilled the roles of  joint-rollers and that everybody was on ‘Keith’s time’ – an allusion to his and Pallenberg’s descent into heroin addiction during this summer.

“‘Happy’ was something I did because I was for one time early for a session. There was Bobby Keys and Jimmy Miller. We had nothing to do and had suddenly picked up the guitar and played this riff. So we cut it and it’s the record, it’s the same. We cut the original track with a baritone sax, a guitar and Jimmy Miller on drums. And the rest of it is built up over that track. It was just an afternoon jam that everybody said, ‘Wow, yeah, work on it'”. ~ Keith Richards on the recording of the Stones standard Happy, which to this day he himself sings on stage while on tour  

One could certainly argue that had the film aimed to be more revelatory then it would have unlikely had the full involvement it does from The Stones – why would verteran rockers like them want to reveal what really went on back then? It’s certainly water on the bridge between them all now. Yet, knowing – if you’ve read around the album’s making – as you would, that Richards may well have moved on to heroin in reaction to Jagger sleeping with his wife while the two of them made the 1971 film Performance together, you may feel a little short-changed not to get more on the obvious antagonism and genuine strains the relationship between the band’s two leaders must have been under at this time. Not to mention the strains that must’ve been showing between the other members too.  

Despite this, the documentary certainly continues to deliver nuggets. For instance, Jagger wrote the album’s hit Tumbling Dice after a conversation with a maid about how to throw dice when gambling. And, when the album’s second half of recording had upped and shifted to LA’s Sunset Sound Recordings studio (as was the norm for Stones albums of this period), following the time at Nellcôte exhausting itself in more ways than one, Mick remarks that he and Keith came up with the lyrics for Casino Boogie by writing phrases on pieces of paper, mixing them all up and pulling them out at random. By then, with difficult tracks as well as easier ones, it was just a matter of getthing them finished and recorded.

Stones In Exile, then, while providing a window – if not a microscope – on to what was going on in the fascinating lives of The Rolling Stones as they made this seminal album, finds its focus in examining exactly how the album itself was made. It was conjured up out of nothing, as good art often is, of course, but with the odds truly stacked against it; and yet, in their characteristic shipshod manner (and then some, in this particular case), Mick, Keith and co. somehow managed to unearth a diamond that to this day may just glimmer brighter than all their other albums.

Funny really then, that – as the film backs up – Mick still seems somewhat non-plussed with it, as if he wonders what all the fuss is about. Mind you, the most driven of The Stones (and its eventual leader), he was always about jumping into the next thing as soon as the last was over. Perhaps that’s why he is such a Soul Survivor – as usual, answers on a postcard as to how exactly Keith is, of course.

You can buy Stones In Exile on DVD here; or if you’re in the UK – and, no doubt, for a short time only – you can watch it on the BBC iPlayer here

Ticker-tape torture: World Cup 1978 ~ Argentina v Holland

June 3, 2010

Super Mario bother: Argentina main man Mario Kempes scores in the ’78 final against Holland, memorably played on a ticker-tape littered pitch – but darkness lurks elsewhere in Buenos Aires

All right, a word of warning before this, my fourth World Cup special, properly kicks-off. If you’ve been enjoying these ramblings from me about fantastic football tournaments past – I know someone out there must have been, surely? – then you may feel short-changed by this one. Yes, the fourth in this series of articles isn’t as celebratory in tone as the others so far. Why? Well, because the 1978 tournament wasn’t exactly one you’d call a classic. In fact, you might even say it was the nadir, the dark moment, certainly the black sheep among the modern-age Cups (and not only because it was the first to feature Coca-Cola as a sponsor). Still, as a culmination to the tale of ‘Total Football’ and being, as it was, the third and final episode in the trilogy of 1970s World Cups, it plays a role that, like it or not, can’t be ignored.

However, at the time, many English people may have preferred to have ignored it. For all the trials and tribulations going on in the UK at the time (strikes by dustmen and gravediggers; PM Jim Callaghan going to the IMF for a loan to bolster the ecomony; and the so-called ‘Winter of Discontent’ that would follow at the end of the year), there was a damn good reason why few looked forward to this World Cup. Yup, for the second time in a row, England had failed to reach the finals themselves – quite some disappointment, especially given both Liverpool and Brian Clough’s Nottingham Forest were dominant in the European Cup around this time. Unlike four years before though, what with a poor qualifying campaign and the falling at the final hurdle thanks to the Wembley draw against Poland, this time the English could probably count themselves unlucky. They had played six games in their qualifying campaign, won five of them and lost only one against Italy. They had won the return home match against the Italians, but the latter had the exact same record and boasted a better goal difference – they were through; England weren’t.

Dot matrix and street wastage: the fun World Cup ’78 poster, logo and mascot, Gauchito; the ‘Winter of Disconent’, with rubbish seen everywhere – a bit like watching England then

Still, those of a more  tartan persuasion had reason to be positive. Just like in ’74, Scotland had succeeded where England could not and were there in Argentina to represent the home nations (actually, thanks to a very controversial penalty awarded against Wales that saw them qualify instead of the latter). And, on paper, they had quite a decent looking team too, featuring the likes of Kenny Dalglish and Graeme Souness of Liverpool, Joe Jordan of Leeds United and Archie Gemmill of Nottingham Forest. Their manager Ally MacLeod wasn’t shy of talking up his side’s chances either, declaring before they flew out that they were so good they would return ‘at least with a medal’. His optimism proved mis-placed, though; in fact, Scotland’s overall performance made his pre-tournament confidence and bluster look rather ridiculous.

They opened their ’78 account by scoring first against Peru, but by the end had conspired to lose 3-1, and they then could only manage a 1-1 draw against Iran (their own goal being an, er, own-goal). Then one of their players, Willie Johnston, was embarassingly sent home for taking a banned stimulant. The third match seemed to promise little then, given it was against the ’74 runners-up Holland. Surely it would be an exercise of damage limitation? However, the Dutch – without the talismanic Cruyff, but otherwise blessed with sheer quality – had started the tournament sluggishly this time and, pulling themselves together, the Scots managed to neutralise striker Rob Resenbrink’s 34th minute penalty when Dalglish grabbed an equaliser ten minutes later. What happened next – just two minutes later, in fact –  has gone down not just in the folklore of Scottish football, but also in the folkore of the entire country itself.

As Scotland pressed forward again, Gemmill latched on to a free-ball on the right and  jinking past two Dutch players and playing a one-two with Dalglish, then deftly dinked the Dutch keeper Jan Jongbloed to put his side 2-1 up with a sensational goal. To this day, it remains one of the greatest goals scored in a World Cup and arguably one of the competition’s all-time golden moments (and plays a pivotal role in the iconic 1996 Britflick Trainspotting). Gemmill then tucked away a penalty to stretch the lead, but his next major moment wasn’t so clever – on 71 minutes Johnny Rep struck in the Scottish penalty area and, thanks to it deflecting off Germmill’s outstretched leg, the ball flew past goalkeeper Alan Rough. What the football gods gaveth Gemmill then, they tooketh away – as so often sadly seems to have been the case with Scotland down through the decades. This, the match’s final goal, pretty much ensured that this rare Scottish victory over the Dutch would be a pyrrhic win – on goal difference, again, they failed to make it through to the second group stage.

“I haven’t felt that good since Archie Gemmill scored against Holland in 1978!”: For Renton – and many Scots – Archie’s golden moment is even better than Trainspotting

Unlike the Scots, Peru – who started their tournament so brightly against the former – went through from their group and, impressively, ahead of the Dutch. Elsewhere, Austria shocked everyone by qualifying from their group ahead of Brazil. Poland, so good in ’74 and still packing Grzegorz Lato up front, managed to top their group ahead of holders West Germany, and Italy went through along with hosts Argentina, whom surely owed a real debt to their fanatical fans’ electric support in every match they played.

On to the second round groups then and, amazingly, Austria went one better than they already had – yes, they somehow defeated their big-time neighbours West Germany 3-2, the hero being forward Hans Krankl whose efforts and those of his teammates are still today lauded as Austrian football’s greatest ever achievement. Indeed, this match, in some ways an echo of the West Germans’ group stage defeat to East Germany in the previous World Cup, dented the Germans’ hopes of making the final, and draws against Italy and Holland (the latter an entertaining, if haphazard, replay of the previous tournament’s final) saw to it their title defence was over.

Conversely, it was in this same group that the Dutch discovered their form and, thanks to a 5-1 demolition of Austria and a 2-1 defeat of Italy, they topped the group. Indeed, although they weren’t exactly playing the brilliantly fluid ‘Total Football’ system they did in ’74 – and were missing Cruyff owing to kidnap threats against him and his family (his absence only being honestly explained in recent years) – they looked the real deal once again, playing fine football and scoring memorable goals. And now, once again, they were through to the World Cup final. What an opportunity, indeed.

The other second round group was, ultimately, struck by controversy; proper controversy. And in a very South American World Cup it involved the group’s three South American sides. Two of them, Brazil and Argentina, dominated proceedings, having both despatched Poland and rather disappointingly drawn 0-0 against each other. The table topper, of course, would go through to the final, so it came down to who could beat Peru by the most number of goals. Where was the controversy here then? Well, if one of the two sides kicked-off their final match – against the Peruvians – after the other’s final match, then they’d know how many goals they’d need to score to go through on goal difference, wouldn’t they? And that’s exactly what happened. And, suspiciously, it happened in favour of the hosts, Argentina – Brazil beat Peru 3-0; their rivals put six past them without reply. The Argentines were therefore through. That wasn’t all that was dodgy, though, given that it emerged the six-time-beaten Peruvian goalkeeper in that match, Ramón Quiroga, had in fact been born in Argentina. Both teams denied collusion in this regard and the tournament’s organisers couldn’t exactly be held culpable for ‘rigging’ Argentina’s progress to the final thanks to their matches’ scheduling, but the coincidences were, nonetheless, undeniable.

And that fact was disappointing because Argentina had a very good side. Coached by the chain-smoking César Luis Menotti (known as El Flaco – ‘The Slim One’) and driven by the centre-back who loved to attack, captain Daniel Passarella (who would go on to manage his nation in the 1998 World Cup), it also featured cultured, diminutive midfielder Osvaldo Ardilles and lanky play-maker Ricky Villa (who would both join English club Tottenham Hotspur the following season) and was spearheaded by moustachioed frontman Leopoldo Luque and major goal threat Mario Kempes. Yes, they were stylish, exciting and easy on the eye – even if, inexplicably, their squad was numbered alphabetically. Yet, as if willed on by the unfair advantage they’d received in match scheduling thanks to their compatriots who organised the whole shebang, they also didn’t mind playing dirty. And, frankly, that mired what should been a fine final.

It all started with the hosts keeping the Dutch waiting ready to start proceedings in Buenos Aires’ Estadio Monumental for five minutes, until they finally emerged from the tunnel to a gigantic tumult from the home fans packing the rafters. And that wasn’t all. In a concerted – and surely pre-arranged – effort, the Argentine players then complained to the referee about Dutch midfielder René van de Kerkhof wearing a plaster cast, even though he’d worn the cast on his wrist without previous complaint since his side’s opening match. Further minutes were wasted over the issue; indeed, the Dutch were so cheesed off they looked like they were about to walk off at one point. Eventually, the game kicked-off and in spite of the unsporting behaviour designed to rattle and unsettle the Dutch, the Argentines appeared to have gained no advantage as a balanced first-half proceeded, complete with a great deal of fouling and rule-breaking – mostly from Argentina – which scandalously, perhaps owing to the overpowering presence of fans with blue and white striped flags, went unpunished.

Winning ugly, losing fair: General Jorge Videla hands winning captain Daniel Passarella the World Cup; Dick Nanninga consoles a teammate after Holland come so close – again

Then, in the 37th minute, the deadlock was broken, as the long-haired Kempes expertly struck, putting his side in front. Unsurprisingly, the crowd went beserk, yet the men in orange didn’t wilt and – the second-half following much the same the pattern as the first – just eight minutes from time, conjured up a nice move topped off with Dick Nanninga heading in an equaliser. 1-1. Extra-time. Having led for some time and seeing victory snatched out of their hands so near the end, it wouldn’t have been surprising had Argentina deflated and run out of juice. Yet, they didn’t. Come the end of the first period of extra-time, up popped that man Kempes again and he just got enough on the ball in the penalty area to see it home and put his nation back in front. It was his sixth goal, giving him the Golden Boot and surely ensuring he was the player of the tournament too. Exhausted after a hard, physical match, the Dutch had gone for good now and, five minutes from the very end, right-winger Daniel Bertoni scored (despite a very strong suggestion of hand-ball), wrapping up the result and sparking delirious celebrations.

For the second World Cup in a row then, the Dutch had fallen at the final hurdle. Would they have managed to win the thing had Cruyff been in the side? Who knows, one can only speculate. Losing twice in a row in the final is a very painful reality, yet with the commendable magic and wonder of ‘Total Football’ which was so much the story of these two tournaments for Holland, theirs are nowadays looked upon as two truly glorious failures – and, because of that, the two sides are probably more fondly remembered than if either one of them had actually triumphed. And there’s something nice but also sort of enigmatically cool about that. After all, ‘Total Football’ was a wonderful dream – and don’t all the best dreams fail in the end?

In contrast, Argentina had won their first World Cup – the congatulations were theirs. Yet, aforementioned controversies aside, there’s more to why I’m not fond of this particular tournament; much more. And it concerns the man who handed Daniel Passerella the trophy after the final whistle: General Jorge Rafael Videla. The country’s leader thanks to his position as head of a miliary junta that had seized control just one year before, Videla was a tyrant of the worst sort. In truth, Argentina’s leadership had been unstable ever since the legendary Juan Perón was deposed by a coup in 1955, in which case one has to question FIFA’s decision to give this country hosting duties in the first place. Especially as, leading up to the tournament, there had been great doubts raised as to the viability and ethics behind it and offers had come from other countries, such as Holland, to host instead. FIFA’s reluctance to step in and do anything would come back to bite it royally on the arse, though, as the chairman of the organising committee General Omar Actis was bumped off – apparently because he spoke out about escalating costs.

Don’t cry for those Argentinians? Buenos Aires’ Naval Mechanics School today – the artwork on the railings speaks a thousand words

The reality was that Videla’s junta was sponsoring forced disappearances and assassinations within Argentina, ostensibly against left-wing figures, yet to to this day nobody knows how many people were affected or killed – the number is thought to be in the thousands, however. This campaign – effectively a campaign of terror – became known as the ‘Dirty War’ and was the backdrop then to the ’78 World Cup. To placate participating nations who were concerned about their teams’ safety if they went to the World Cup, Videla said that there would be no bloodshed during the tournament – apparently, this was good enough for FIFA. Perhaps rightly so, Holland had called for a boycott before they, obviously, relented. Meanwhile, German Paul Breitner (who had scored a penalty in the ’74 final) wouldn’t take part and for many years it was assumed this too was the reason for Cruyff’s absence.

In perhaps the most stark summation of the situation, it has been said that inmates in Buenos Aires’ infamous Naval Mechanics School, which was used as a concentation camp at this time and is located only about a mile away from the Estadio Monumental, could hear the roars of the crowd during the final. While the football was generally good and the tournament entertaining, the off-field reality of this World Cup was simply monstrous, to my mind.

Indeed, years later ’78 World Cup winner Leopoldo Luque admitted: “With what I know now, I can’t say I’m proud of my victory. But I didn’t realise; most of us didn’t. We just played football.”  He has also said: “In hindsight, we should never have played that World Cup. I strongly believe that.”

Not since Mussolini’s grandstanding of fascism when Italy hosted the competition in 1934 had the ugliness and evil the real world can create impinged on and blighted a World Cup – let’s hope it never does so again.

Motorcycle emptiness: Dennis Hopper, RIP

June 2, 2010

Cool runnings: Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda ride their hogs into history in Easy Rider

He was a maverick, a one-off, a seemingly indestructible hell-raiser, but on Saturday he proved to be just as fallible as everyone else. Dennis Hopper, an iconic figure who co-created a classic slice of counter-culture cinema and continued to cut his self-styled swathe through Hollywood for a further four decades has died from prostate cancer, aged 74.

He was born on May 17 1936 in Dodge City, Kansas, USA, his father having served in the US Government’s Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner to the CIA. Growing up in San Diego, the young Dennis developed an interest in acting and studied at the Old Globe Theatre, then, as a young man, moved to New York City and enrolled at the Actors Studio under the legendary Lee Strasbourg, whom he studied under for five years. While there he befriended British actor Vincent Price, whose interest in art rubbed off on Hopper too.

His acting career took off in the ’50s with appearances in TV dramas – among them Bonanza, Gunsmoke and The Twilight Zone – and he successfully moved into film, appearing most notably in Rebel Without A Cause (1955), Giant (1956), Gunfight At The OK Corral (1957), The Sons Of Katie Elder (1965), Cool Hand Luke (1967), Hang ‘Em High (1968) and True Grit (1969). Even at this early stage of this career, he had already developed a reputation for being difficult and, in later years, would credit John Wayne for revitilising his career by ensuring he was cast in The Sons Of Katie Elder owing to his mother-in-law being a friend of the Hollywood giant.

In 1967, Hopper starred in cult film The Trip. Directed by low-budget filmmaker supremo Roger Corman, the  lead role was taken by Peter Fonda – son of Henry and brother of Jane – and it was written by relative unknown Jack Nicholson. Featuring a hallucinogenic sequence (hence its title), the movie made great use of psychedelic effects; this and its subject matter and tone made it something of a precursor for what would come next for Hopper. It was, of course, Easy Rider.

Co-scripted by Hopper, Fonda and legendary ’60s writer Terry Southern, and directed by Hopper and produced by Fonda, the production was beset by disagreements between the latter two, but somehow they managed to make a film that had a staggering effect on moviegoers of the time and is rightly considered an all-time classic and an era-defining piece of US and Western culture. Its disenfanchised, confusing and ultimately undefined representation of American youth rang a chord with – and rang true about – a generation that was unhappy with the Vietnam War, experimenting with drugs and looking for something more than their country seemed to be offering them. The two lead characters – played by Hopper and Fonda – go looking for America, but in the end find nothing.

The film was also notable for giving Nicholson his big break, as he played a disillusioned lawyer who shares pot with the two protagonists around a campfire (a scene in which the three actors famously smoked real marijuana) and travels with them someway. Nicholson was nominated for an Oscar for his acting; Hopper, meanwhile was nominated for the Best Original Screenplay Oscar, along with Fonda and Southern, and was nominated for the Cannes Film Festival’s Palme d’Or award for his direction.

Hopper followed up Easy Rider by making The Last Movie, in which he starred alongside Fonda again. Released in 1971, the film won the Critics Prize at the Venice Film Festival, but its heavily existential plot proved too much for audiences and it bombed at the box-office. This perceived failure helped bring about an exile from Hollywood, which was aided by Hopper’s growing drug addiction problems. Around this time too he divorced his first wife, actress Brooke Hayward, and married Michelle Phillips, singer with the folk-rock group The Mamas And The Papas. It was not a successful second marriage – lasting only nine days, as it did.

By the end of the ’70s, Hopper’s film career hadn’t recovered, even though he’d reminded the filmgoing public of his charismatic, individual presence by playing the manic, perhaps insane, ‘American Photojournalist’ in Francis Ford Coppola’s outstanding comment on the Vietnam War Apocalypse Now (1979). Indeed, in his book Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, author Peter Biskind alleges that during this period Hopper was consuming up to three grams of cocaine and 30 beers, as well as marijuana and Cuba Libre cigars, everyday. He even staged a truly surreal stunt – supposedly an effort at performance art – that saw him lie in a coffin hooked up to dynamite, which was followed by him disappearing into the Mexican desert while on a bender. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this episode led to him entering drug rehabilitation. Nonetheless, at this time he also managed to turn in well-recieved performances in Coppola’s gritty urban drama Rumble Fish (1983)  and Sam Peckinpah’s thriller The Osterman Weekend (1983).

Into the heart of darkness: Hopper with Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now – the former claimed making this film (difficult and traumatic for many) was one of the great experiences of his life

It was thanks to eccentric genius or bizarro (depending on your viewpoint) director David Lynch, though, that Hopper’s career finally turned around, as the former cast him in the dark psychological thriller Blue Velvet (1986), opposite Isabella Rosselini and Kyle Maclachan. Hopper played the mentally unhinged Frank Booth, whose gas-mask wearing, unabated swearing and generally frightening demeanour made for an unforgettable, if disturbing, cinematic creation. A highly acclaimed performance, he followed it up with an Oscar-nominated supporting role in Hoosiers (1987), a basketball drama starring Gene Hackman, and his career turnaround seemed complete. Indeed, he then directed the noted police drama Colors (1988), starring Sean Penn and Robert Duvall.

In the ’90s, Hopper made hay out of playing colourful cartoonish villains in high-profile action and adventure movies, first the ill-conceived Super Mario Brothers (1993), then the hugely popular Speed (1994) and finally the notorious, but ultimately successful, Waterworld (1995). Then in the ’00s he memorably played villain Victor Drazen in the first season of hit espionage TV drama 24. His final film was 2008’s Elegy, in which he starred opposite Ben Kingsley, Penelope Cruz and former Blondie frontwoman Debbie Harry, and he received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on March 26 this year.

Less well known about Hopper is that his interest in art saw him dabble in painting, poetry writing and photography. His efforts at the latter saw him establish himself as a respected photographer; in fact, his work included the cover art for the Ike and Tina Turner single River Deep, Mountain High, released in 1966. Also, at one stage in the ’60s, he owned an early print of Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans – he’d bought it for just $75.

In an ironic twist, the once counter-culture outsider publically supported the Republican Party in his later years, donating money to the Republican National Committee. In spite of this, he supported Barack Obama in the 2008 Presidential Election, apparently owing to John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin as running-mate. Just goes to show then that, even prety much at the end, the five-times-married, rebellious anti-hero of Hollywood truly was as unpredictably non-conformist as he ever was. As Easy Rider’s Billy said: “What the hell is wrong with freedom? That’s what it’s all about”…

Netherlands Neverland: World Cup ’74 ~ West Germany versus Holland

May 31, 2010

Dutch courage: The Oranje look nervous before the ’74 final – would they hold their nerve and win their nation’s first ever World Cup with the hippy-esque ‘Total Football’ philosophy…?

1974. For many across the UK and the USA, it’s a year that generally doesn’t conjure up fond memories. Strikes. The three-day week. Watergate. The Birmingham pub bombings. The Middle East oil crisis. Israel and Palestine at each other’s throats. Even the Bond film that came out that year, The Man With The Golden Gun, was a rare mis-step for the  cool superspy – it’s arguably the artistic nadir of the hugely popular cinematic series. What was needed was something to cheer everybody up. How about a World Cup in the summer? That’d do the trick, wouldn’t it?

For this, the third World Cup special here at George’s Journal in the run up to next month’s much anticipated football-athon in South Africa, we’re looking at the ’74 tournament and easily the most remembered match from it – the final. Of all World Cups this was a particularly interesting one and that final an intriguing match, to say the least. And, together, yes, they probably did go some way to cheering up most folks that summer. Well, unless you were English, that is.

For the times, they had ‘a-changed. Charlton, Hurst and Moore (more or less) had gone and Sir Alf Ramsey himself was now on the brink. Why was the once messiah-like manager about to lose his job? The answer lies behind the reason why Englishmen weren’t looking forward to this World Cup – you see, for the first time, England hadn’t made it. Not that it had been for want of trying. Well, in one match in the qualifying campaign, at least.

Into the light, back to the dark: The bright, bold and stylish logo and poster for West Germany’s World Cup of 1974 ; a secretary forced to work by candelight during Britain’s three-day-week in the winter of the same year

The notion that England wouldn’t reach the World Cup was unthinkable – in England, that is. But following a drab qualifying campaign, that was the prospect facing the team that lined up next to Poland on October 17 1973 at Wembley, and the entire nation as it sat in front of its TV sets to watch this final World Cup qualifier live – a very rare occurence at the time. Unfortunately, none of them would end up wallowing in what they saw. The men in white lay seige in the Polish half and a fair amount of the game was made up of continual attacks on the opposition goal. All the shots were either missed or saved by the outstanding keeper Jan Tomaszewski, whom before the match young Nottingham Forest manager and rising star of the domestic game Brian Clough, in the comfort of a TV studio,  had branded a ‘clown’; the man clearly, most assuredly wasn’t.

Then, in a moment of madness, Bobby Moore’s replacement for the fixture, Leeds centre-back Norman Hunter, inexplicably pulled out of a tackle and the impressive Grzegorz Lato raced away in a counter-attack and passed to teammate Jan Domarski who put the Poles – unthinkably – 1-0 up. England managed to draw level before the end thanks to an Allan Clarke penalty, but that wasn’t enough, just like all their efforts that hadn’t gone in the net. They had needed the win and hadn’t got it and, thus, wouldn’t qualify for the World Cup. In their place, Poland would.

Perhaps one saving grace though, come the World Cup itself, was that oddly three other big-time European football forces hadn’t qualified either, namely Spain, France and Hungary (the latter having had a legendary side in the ’50s). In fact, this development had ensured there were places for some unusual first-time entrants to the competition proper – making their debut then were the exotic-sounding quartet of Zaire (the first ever African qualifiers), Australia, Haiti and East Germany.

It couldn’t happen, could it?: the programme for a fateful match at Wembley; and Grzegorz Lato, the Pole who made hay while England crumbled – watch out the World Cup…!

Indeed, the East Germans’ presence gave the contest a fair degree of spice, not only because it was being held by their fast globally-developing West German neighbours, but also because the two nations had been drawn in the same opening group and would meet each other. This match, one of the real early highlights of the tournament, to much surprise resulted in a 1-0 win for the Eastern half of Germany thanks to a goal from midfielder Jürgen Sparwasser, who 14 years later was to defect while playing in a veterans’ tournament in West Germany.

To say the West Germans – with the talent at their disposal including  1970 survivors captain Franz Beckenbauer and striker extraordinaire Gerd Müller – were disappointed would be an understatement; to say they were emabarrassed would be very fair too – especially given the fact that at this time, of course, the Cold War was very much still raging and the political and cultural division between the Soviet-driven East and the US-led West was defined in this carved-in-two-country like nowhere else on earth. Indeed, this defeat for West Germany made them take a long, hard look at their approach to this competition and the changes that yielded would pay them unquestioned dividends.

While they were the hosts and, as the tournament progressed, proved to be one of its strongest sides, West Germany, however, weren’t the star turn at this World Cup. If the yellow of Brazil had been the colour of the ’70 tournament, then the orange of Holland was very much the colour of this one. Like the Brazilians of four years before, the Dutch brought a style, a brand, a philosophy of football that was radically new and a complete break from what had gone before – it was called ‘Total Football’, and it was totally brilliant.

Grudge match: West German captain Franz Beckenbauer and East German captain Bernd Bransch shake hands before their sides’ group game; later, East Germany take a shock lead

Make no mistake, Holland had never been a football power (the last time they’d qualified for a World Cup was way back in 1938), yet their emergence this year wasn’t entirely a bolt from the blue – or, rather, amber – either. Using this radical tactical revolution, the Dutch champions Ajax had won the European Cup a highly impressive three years in a row in the early ’70s, and the Dutch national team of ’74 was almost exclusively made up of the best from Ajax’s ranks. Chief among these was the incredibly talented Johan Cruyff – a player who, by the end of the decade if not earlier, would be spoken of by many in the same breath as the extraordinary Pelé. And not just because of his natty trademark move – coined the ‘Cruyff turn’ – which was debuted in this tournament’s Holland-Sweden match, and saw him feign to play the ball one way and then drag it behind his standing leg and, turning 180 degrees to perfect the deception, move off in the other direction, leaving an opposing, facing player looking like a right charlie.

Cruyff ostensibly lined up as a centre-forward, ostensibly being the operative word. For the notion behind ‘Total Football’ was that each of the ten outfield players of a team – Cruyff and everybody else – would essentially be able to play in any role on the pitch (attacker, midfielder or defender) depending on where they found themselves at any one moment and as circumstance dictated. The philosophy was all about space; a player would fill the space of another who had received the ball and was now attacking the opposition with it, therefore the player would need to be talented enough to play anywhere on the field. It sounds simple and the Dutch, amazingly, made it look simple.

In their opening group they brushed aside Uruguay 2-0, thanks to two goals from ‘forward’ Johnny Rep, and took Bulgaria apart to the tune of 4-1, with another goal from Rep and two from Johan Neeskens (both of which were penalties), and finally they drew 0-0 with Sweden. Their form was easily good enough to see them through to the next round as group winners. Joining them there were Brazil – perhaps predictably, but with nothing like the side of four years before – and Yugoslavia, who both qualified from the same group at the expense of Scotland and Zaire.

Yes, that’s right, in England’s absence, the plucky Scots were flying the flag for the home nations, and they were plucky too. But ultimately unlucky. Somehow, they, Brazil and the Yugoslavs all managed to accrue exactly the same points tallies from playing each other, meaning the two sides that would go through would be the two who beat Zaire by the most goals – Yugoslavia put a whomping nine past them, Brazil three and Scotland could only manage two. So the Scots went home without losing a match and after holding the once mighty Brazil to a 0-0 draw. At least, when they got home, they’d have the bragging rights over them down south.

Elsewhere, East Germany qualified for the next round above West Germany from the same group (thanks to their win over them), while, their unexpected draw against the English seemingly a sign of things to come, Poland also made it through, shocking both Italy and Argentina on the way, beating them as they did. The Argentines squeaked through with them; the Italians, shamefaced, went out.

Now, what followed was a peculiar, and often forgotten thing in football lore, yes, the second round of this and the next two  World Cups was a second group stage. Why there weren’t  just quarter finals and then semi-finals instead, as there had been in the ’60s tournaments, frankly is anyone’s guess – it would have been far more sensible and simpler. But, rather like Claudio Rainieri, FIFA decided to tinker substantially in the ’70s, so the eight remaining teams now found themselves split into another two groups of four, the winners of which would go on to play each other in the final.

“Rumor had it I was richly rewarded for the goal, with a car, a house and a cash premium. But that is not true.” ~ East German Jürgen Sparwasser on his crucial contribution to the politically charged 1-0 defeat over West Germany in the ’74 World Cup

The first of the two new groups pitted the increasingly irresistible Holland against the South Americans, and the Dutch didn’t disappoint – they beat Argentina 4-0, with two goals from Cruyff, and Brazil 2-0, in which Neeskens grabbed another. Easily the class act of the group, Holland went through to the final; Brazil finished runners-up. The second group saw a revitalised West Germany storm through with three wins out of three – Müller grabbing a goal each against Yugoslavia and Poland. Yet, for their part, the Poles didn’t give up. Indeed, they managed to win their other two games (Lato scoring in them both), which meant they finished second in the group, setting up a play-off against the Brazilians.

Believe it or not, their fine form didn’t end there either, thanks to yet another strike from the goal machine that was Lato, they defeated Brazil,  ensuring they amazingly ended the tournament in third place. Lato himself won the Golden Boot award with seven goals, and would go on to play in the next two World Cups for his country. Some football fans, given his exploits,  believe the feller to be one of the sport’s great underrated players – quite frankly, you can see where they’re coming from.

And so to the big one – the final. The competition’s class acts versus the hosts. The cultured Dutch versus the efficient Germans. Undeniably, as they were beginning to make a habit of doing (and, of course, would carry on doing for decade upon decade), the Germans had done well to pull themselves together and, like a well-oiled BMW engine, motor their way through to the last two. But the men from The Netherlands were more than a well-oiled machine, they were like an oil painting on a football pitch – with big, beautiful brushstrokes of orange paint. Surely the final was there for the taking for Cruyff and co. Wasn’t it? Perhaps they thought so themselves.

Genius at work: Johan Cruyff pulls off the move he gave his name to against Sweden

You see, for all their talent and promise, the Dutch had a weakness in this World Cup – one which only surfaced in this final tie. Namely, they knew how good they were. Many great sides are aware of how good they are, of course, but the trick is not to get carried away with it, to keep a level head, have some humility. Sure, Holland weren’t exactly strutting about like arrogant troubadours, but for the same token they weren’t exactly shy and retiring like little mice hiding in clogs either. It’s probably fair to say they were guilty of a fair bit of football hubris going into the final.

However, if that were the case, it’s very understandable. The extraordinary notion-made-practice that was ‘Total Football’ had already been proved (remember Dutch giants Ajax had triumphed in the European Cup three seasons in a row coming into this World Cup), so the national team had enormous belief they could repeat the trick, despite their virtually non-existent record in the competition’s history. And putting this liberated, free-flowing, fantasy-like football philosophy in place had forged an interesting collective personality in this Ajax/ Holland group of players, which rather mirrored ‘Total Football’ itself. In short, the Dutch team were, well, rather hippy-ish.

Many footballers of this era – like a lot of blokes – had long hair, of course, but Cruyff and his teammates seemed to have something more; they acted cooller, more aloof, more ‘above it all’ than other teams; almost as if, like their sixth sense on the pitch, there was some higher or spiritual understanding at work among them. Over the years since, there have even been rumours the players and their wives dabbled in  ‘free love’ – substantiating those rumours, though, would be nigh-on impossible, I’d imagine. Still, when it came down to this final 90 minutes of football, all that added up to a weakness for the Dutch, and one which – in their resilient, resourceful way – the West Germans exploited.

Goal machine: Gerd Müller takes his World Cup tally to a record-breaking 14 goals – across just two tournaments – as he scores in the final

Not that it started out that way, mind. The Dutch kicked off at Munich’s Olympiastadion (home of Bayern Munich football club) and, thirteen passes later, Cruyff went on a short solo run, beating defender – and, later, Germany national coach – Berti Vogts and was brought down by Uli Hoeneß centimetres outside the penalty area. Nevertheless, in his infinite wisdom, English referee Jack Taylor awarded a penalty, which Neeskens put away. The Dutch had scored inside a minute (from a penalty, the first ever scored in a World Cup final) and before the Germans had even touched the ball. Shocking stuff. The Dutch, then, were on their way and looked to be cruising for the next 25 minutes until Bernd Hölzenbein fell in the Dutch penalty area and Taylor awarded another controversial pernalty, which full-back Paul Brietner tucked away. This, unquestionably, was the turning point.

Holland seemed, rather oddly, stunned – yet it wasn’t the first time they’d conceded a goal in the tournament – and the Germans’ belief and endeavour increased. They began to push and in the 43rd minute, just before half-time, Müller characteristically scored an opportune goal (his 14th and final World Cup goal – a record he held for 32 years until Brazil’s Ronaldo broke it) giving his side a lead they were never to relinquish. Both the Germans and the Dutch had chances in the second half – the former having a goal disallowed and a penalty appeal waved away – but victory, surprisingly, was the host’s. ‘Total Football’ had been defeated and the Dutch dream was over.

So what can you make of that final and the ’74 World Cup in general? Well, yes, the exciting yet cool Netherlands and their fancy fantasy playing style had failed – and it’s easy to suggest that this group of players with their hippy-esque football conceit proved unsuccessful rather like how hippies themselves and the counter-culture itself faded and went out of fashion by the middle of this decade. Yet, maybe it would be too neat to come to that conclusion, and perhaps it’s more pertinent to look at the victors and what this competition meant for them. For, surely without doubt, both physically and psychologically the winner of this World Cup was West Germany, not just because they won the thing, but also because they hosted it. Yes, after the colourful sunniness of 1970, this one is often remembered as the one that seemed to be constantly beset by rain and lacking two or three major nations, but it was a huge advert for West Germany – indeed, a country that by this point could no longer  be ignored on the world stage.

Kaiser chief: Beckenbauer lifts the new World Cup trophy high as Adrian Chiles successfully lurks in the background

Thanks to the bolstering of its economy by the United States and the other Allied powers immediately following the Second World War (in order to ensure both West Berlin and the western half of Germany in general didn’t fall to Communism and the USSR), the country achieved what is commonly referred to as the West German Wirtschaftswunder (economic miracle). So much so that, in 1973, just one year earlier than the World Cup, it could boast the world’s fourth largest gross domestic product (GDP), 5.9 percent of the world’s total. While the likes of the UK suffered economic turmoil in the ’70s, seemingly lurching from one crisis to the next, there’s no doubt that the nation England had defeated in the ’66 final was well and truly on the up. And winning the World Cup on home soil, with all its glittering, impressive stadia, was surely the icing on the cake. After all, they’d won the European Championships in 1972 and, thus, now held the two most coveted trophies in football at the same time.

Yes, there was no doubt about it, West Germany was now the top dog in Europe and – in football, at least – across the entire world. But what would happen in four years’ time in 1978 when the competition would head back to South America? Could Die Nationalelf hold on to their trophy? And what would this World Cup as the ’70s headed towards their end bring? Well, there’s only one way to find out, folks, yes, you’ll have to read all about it in the next World Cup special here at George’s Journal – until then, like an opponent having just been done by a ‘Cruyff turn’, watch this space…

Yellow fever: World Cup ’70 ~ Brazil v Italy

May 21, 2010

The beautiful game: the yellow-jerseyed Brazil line up next to Italy before one of the greatest World Cup matches ever played – the talismanic Pelé fittingly standing out, looking towards us

So, following the first World Cup special here at George’s Journal focusing on the ’66 event, the second inevitably looks at the next tournament (an absolute cracker) as well as, rightly so, the best remembered match from the World Cup of… 1970.

As this year began, many in Britain and elsewhere could have been forgiven for probably thinking the values, ideals and ethos of the previous decade would continue. Sure, the UK economy had endured a dodgy time of it towards the end of the ’60s, but a generally optimistic ten years that had given rise to modern consumerism, progressive civil legislation, real disposable income for young people and ‘free love’ could only bring a bright future, right? Well, as we know, that’s not exactly what happened.

The trials and tribulations of the ’70s were yet to come, of course, but by the time the ninth World Cup kicked off in Mexico on May 31, there were signs that this new decade certainly wasn’t going to be an automatic continuation of the previous one. January brought the break-up of two of the cultural cornerstones of the ’60s, both of them music groups – Diana Ross and The Supremes and The Beatles. The folk-rock duo that had provided the soundtrack to the film The Graduate, Simon And Garfunkel, would soon throw in the towel as well. And then, in April, less than eight months after the worldwide jubilation and wonder brought about by Apollo 11’s Moon landing, NASA would face disaster like it never had before with the extraordinary yet unsettling epsiode of Apollo 13, which thankfully, of course, resulted in a daring rescue of three astronauts from certain death.

Signs of the times: (left to right) Mexico ’70’s colourful logo and mascot, Juanito; BBC 2 launches colour TV in Britain; and Enoch Powell stirs up a hornet’s nest

Once underway, the World Cup itself underlined a couple of breaks from the past too – this time though, both of them positive. In 1968, Tory MP Enoch Powell had delivered a deliberately provocative speech about British  immigration. Forever after referred to as the ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech, it stirred up a great deal of ill-feeling towards migrants newly arriving in Britain and those who had arrived in the last ten or so years, many of them afro-Caribbean. Indeed, so powerful was the effect of this speech that it has been speculated whether it helped swing the 1970 UK General Election the Tories’ way when this was held on June 18 – others speculated that the sitting Labour government’s defeat in the election was due to England’s fate in the World Cup itself; but more on that later.

So what has ‘Rivers of Blood’ got to do with the 1970 World Cup? Well, it so happened that, in Britian and around Europe, this was the tournament that properly introduced football fans to a nation, nay, a footballing philosophy, that they immediately fell in love with… Brazil. And, indeed, many of the Brazilian players on show were either black or of tanned skin. If that wasn’t a positive thing following ‘Rivers of Blood’ two years before and all it stoked up, then I’ll be damned.

And the second positive break from the past this World Cup brought? Well, that too played a big role in the sudden appeal of the sensational Brazilians, because it was the arrival of colour television. TV in Britain had only gone colour in 1967 (and only to help break in the new BBC2 channel), so the liberation from monochrome viewing was brand, spanking new and it paid dividends for this World Cup. Suddenly, football pitches were actually green, fans in the stands looked multi-coloured, teams wore kits that were no longer either white, black or different shades of grey, and right in the middle of it all were the Brazilians, incandescent in bright yellow jerseys and blue shorts – their football and their appearance were an absolute feast for the eyes.

England expects: Bobby Moore on the cover of Radio Times; Geoff Hurst has the bulldog spirit

If you were English, though, as Mexico ’70 kicked off, it was only about one thing – England going over there and defending their crown, retaining the Jules Rimet trophy. Hopes were high; England actually flew out to Central America with an improved side on the one that had won the whole shebang four years previously. But, before the thing itself had even begun, tragedy struck. The team were based in Colombia in order to play a few warm-up matches and, while there, captain Bobby Moore – the biggest hero of ’66 – and Bobby Charlton walked into a jewellery shop to buy a present for the latter’s wife, only for Moore to end up bizarrely accused of theft by the shopkeeper and getting arrested.

Unsurprisingly, this caused an almighty rumpus on this side of the pond and, once it became pretty obvious our Bobby had been set up, resulted in then Prime Minister Harold Wilson making himself clear through the Foreign Office to the Colombian government that the matter be cleared up as quickly as possible, otherwise a diplomatic incident may occur. Moore was duly bailed allowing him to play in the World Cup and exonerated later in the summer.

As if that wasn’t challenging enough, England also had the prospect of having to play the much fancied Brazil in the opening group stage of the tournament, in addition to the decent European sides Romania and Czechoslovakia. Brazil recorded solid wins over the supposedly lesser sides in the group – 4-1 against Czechoslovakia and 3-2  against Romania – and England beat them both 1-0. This meant it all came down the England-Brazil clash to decide who would top the group. In spite of being played in the torrid heat of Guadalajara, it turned out to be an absolute classic; probably one of the best ever remembered World Cup matches.

Friends and foes: Bobby Moore and Pelé swap shirts at the end of the England-Brazil game

The most recalled – and reshown – moment was an outrageous save by illustrious England goalkeeper Gordon Banks from an ace downward header from Brazilian genius Pelé. Frankly, the save was so good it defied belief. The match was eventually won by Brazil thanks to a single goal by the glorious striker Jairzinho, thanks to a magnificent second of cushioned-ball control from Pelé, on 59 minutes. Thus, Brazil topped the group, England finished second and both progressed to the quarter finals.

Another moment from the match, forever captured in time thanks to a photo reproduced the world over, was when Bobby Moore and Pelé shook hands and exchanged shirts at the end of the match – there was utter respect and, more, true joy between the two; surely the best defender and the best forward, respectively, of their era. They were to become firm friends in future.

Had England beaten Brazil, they would have faced Peru in the quarter final (in an open, attacking game, the men in yellow went on to beat their fellow South Americans 4-2 to go through to the semis), but by taking second place in their group, they instead set up a date with destiny… in a repeat of the final four years before,  they played, yes, West Germany. It could only have been really, couldn’t it? However, as it happened, it appeared this twist of fate wasn’t such a bad thing. Indeed, despite Banks going down to food poisoning immediately prior to the match and his understudy Peter Bonetti filling in between the sticks, by the 49th minute England had a very healthy 2-0 lead, thanks to goals from Alan Mullery and Martin Peters. But nothing’s ever simple when it comes to England.

Never out of the game, the Germans got a goal back in the 68th minute through terrific midfielder Franz Beckenbauer, and this changed the match completely. Or, at least, England’s manager Sir Alf Ramsey’s reaction to it did. In a surprising and unprecedented move, Ramsey substituted the string-pulling veteran midfielder Bobby Charlton and, without him, England found they could no longer control the pace of the game. West Germany began to mount fast attack after fast attack and, eventually, turned around a 2-0 scoreline against them into a 3-2 win thanks to goals from Uwe Seeler and, in extra time, Gerd Müller – both of which resulted from mistakes by Bonetti in the English goal. So, England were out and had failed in their bid to defend the World Cup. The Germans had their unlikely revenge and wouldn’t be beaten by England again competitively for another 30 years until the European Championships in 2000. The nation was disappointed, unquestionably, but so disappointed as a nation as to unseat the current government in a General Election a few days later? Hardly. And, after all, plucky old England, of course, wasn’t to know what its international team’s future would be like from this point on…

The semi-finals produced two more fine matches, contested, as they were, between four previous World Cup winners. In the first, Brazil played Uruguay. The latter team managed to take the lead after 20 minutes, but after conceding an equaliser right on half-time, by the time the game entered its last 20 minutes, inevitably the Uruguayans couldn’t stem the Brazilian attack any longer and lost 3-1, thanks to goals from Jairzinho and ace young winger Roberto Rivelino.

The second semi-final was unforgettable. It was West Germany versus Italy (the latter having qualified sluggishly from their group, but improving dramatically in their quarter final match) and, from the 8th minute onwards the Italians led… all the way until stoppage time when the Germans hit back with a late, late equaliser. Into extra-time it went and, extraordinarily, there were a further five goals, including two from the sensational Gerd Müller. TV replays were still showing the latter’s second goal when, unmarked in the penalty box, Gianni Rivera scored for the Italians – and that’s how it stayed, Italy winning 4-3. During the match Beckenbauer even broke his arm, but was forced to play on until the end wearing a sling because the Germans had already brought on their maximum two substitutes. Perhaps fittingly, the match quickly became known as the ‘Game of the Century’ – especially in Italy and Germany – and a plaque at the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City where it took place commerorates it as such. Müller finished the tournament as top scorer with a stunning ten goals, six of which came as back-to-back hat-tricks across two groups games. Rivera is currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament.

And so to the final itself, Brazil versus Italy; and what a final. It was former who took the initiative. In the 18th minute, and from a throw-in, Rivelino volleyed the ball across the penalty area and Pelé rose to score from a lovely header. Fittingly, given who scored it, this was Brazil’s 100th goal in the World Cup. However, just as they were beginning to get into their rhythm of beautiful football against a more defensive-looking Italian side from the previous two matches, come the 37th minute they got complacent in defence and the Azurri forwards took full advantage, Boninsegna getting the final touch to equalise. In truth, though, Italy look tired and weary in the Mexican sun after their heroics in the semi-final. Yet, the Italian defence was also mean as beans and, discounting the three they’d conceded in the seven-goal semi thriller, they had only allowed in two goals all tournament. It would be impressive indeed for Brazil to breach ther goal again, especially as this was a World Cup final. But that’s exactly what the Brazilians did, and more.

The Kaiser and the king: Franz Beckenbauer scores against England and Pelé celebrates Brazil’s 100th World Cup goal

The breakthrough came on 66 minutes when midfielder Gérson hit a long range effort past Italian keeper Enrico Albertosi. A stunning strike; Brazil now looked like they’d probably score more and only had to wait three minutes for the next one to arrive. Gérson sent a free kick up towards Pelé and the latter nodded it down into the path of Jairzinho who, with the defender on him, just did enough to beat the onrushing Albertosi and the ball rolled into the corner. Now two goals clear, the Brazilians surely couldn’t be caught, could they? They couldn’t; Italy had gone. And in the 86th minute the yellow-shirted ones delivered the showstopper, the coup de grace.

What follwed has not just over time proved to be the greatest goal scored in a World Cup final, but also surely the best goal scored in any World Cup. It involved eight players and was a moment of fantasy football. The move started just outside the Brazilian penalty area with striker Tostão, who, having started it ran all the way to the Italian penalty area in case he were needed. Meanwhile, in his absence, Clodoaldo beat four Italian players in his own half, then passed to Rivelino who arrowed a pass down the left-wing to Jairzinho. Moving inside, the latter passed to Pelé in the middle, who, with wonderful deftness, held up the ball and touched it on to the captain Carlos Alberto, arriving late all the way from right-back, who smashed his shot past Albertosi and into the bottom corner. The crowd went absolutely wild and rightly so – Brazil had topped off a 4-1 hammering of Italy in the World Cup final with a wonder goal.

And so that was that. The South Americans were World Cup champions for a record third time, which meant they got to keep the elegant Jules Rimet trophy (the present World Cup trophy would be awarded for the first time at the next tournament). Not just that, though. The manner in which they won the thing would never be seen again in a World Cup or any serious football competition. This Brazilian side was easily the most attacking, free-flowing and magical ever to win the Cup – watching them compared to the top international sides of today is like watching the Harlem Globetrotters transferred to football; the difference being of course the Brazil of 1970 weren’t an exhibition side, they competed and won the top prize. Their blend of skill, grace, power and pace was simply stunning.

Take that!: Carlos Alberto’s wonder goal seen from two different angles

In qualifying for the finals, they played six matches, won them all, scoring 23 goals and conceding just two. Once there, they played another six matches and again won them all, scoring 42 goals and conceding 8. This truly was a side that, not being frugal at the back like Italy mostly were, really did play to the maxim ‘don’t worry about defence, we’ll just score one – or most likely – two or more than you’. And, needless to say, they were brilliant at it. There was an ebullient innocence in the way they played and won the World Cup, which along with their colourful, exciting appearance on newly launched colour television, made them an instant sensation the world over. Plus, of course, to the average Anglo-Saxon ear, their names were wonderfully exotic too – Carlos Alberto, Jairzinho, Rivelino, Tostão and Pelé. Ah, Pelé, perhaps the final word on Brazil in ’70 should go to him.

Having played in three previous World Cups, this would be the great man’s last – and obviously he’d bowed out in the best possible way. For me, there’s no question he’s the best player there’s ever been. In the ’58 World Cup held in Sweden, he played an astonishing  star role that included a second half hat-trick in the final against the host nation to gave  Brazil their first title. And back then he was only 17. Four years later in Chile, he was again decisive, even though he was injured before the final (Brazil won again, though, thanks to two goals in the final from the legendary Garincha). In ’66 he had less fun, though, when he was fouled out of a group match against Portugal; Brazil followed him out of the competition. Owing to that overly harsh treatment and disappointment, he vowed never to play in a World Cup again. Obviously he changed his mind, and thank goodness he did.

Indeed, perhaps his two most memorable moments in the ’70 tournament were two chances he missed. The first was in a group match against Czechoslovakia when he tried to beat the keeper from inside his own half and saw the ball bounce just wide of the goal, and the second was in the semi-final against Uruguay when he sprinted after the ball into the penalty area and, terrifically dummying the oncoming goalkeeper, shot just wide. He finished his career having scored over 1,000 goals – in fact, the 1,000th had come from the penalty spot in 1969, immediately after which fans invaded the pitch in celebration.

So, away from football, sport and entertainment in general, much crap was to come in the ’70s, of course, but in addition to the year’s infamous Isle Of Wight music festival, held in August and attended by a staggering 600,000 people (one of the biggest human gatherings of the time), the efforts of Pelé and co, and  the sunniness, vibrancy and sheer joty of World Cup ’70 helped ensure that this summer, in Britain at least, went some way towards feeling like another ‘summer of love’. Yes, he future could wait, for the time being…

Come on see the noise: Top Of The Pops photo exhibition ~ V&A Museum

May 20, 2010

Glam champions: the legendary Slade, regulars from the golden era of Top Of The Pops, in an image on show at the V&A exhibition

If you go down to the V&A today, you’ll be sure of something of a surprise. For the world famous London museum, known for its huge collection of decorative art objects from times past, is currently playing host to a free exhibition of photos taken especially for the Beeb’s classic midweek chart music-themed magaine show Top Of The Pops.

Specifically displaying the work of Harry Goodwin, the programme’s resident photographer from its very first show broadcast on New Year’s Day 1964 right through to 1973, the exhibition features images of the major figures from the Merseybeat, ‘British invasion’, psychedelic rock, Motown and glam rock eras; among them The Fabs, The Stones, The Kinks, Ike and Tina Turner, Pink Floyd, Elton John and Marc Bolan.

Snap happy: Harry Goodwin (left), TOTP’s resident photographer for the first nine years of the show’s existence; and his image of Jimi Hendrix from 1967 (right), simulating the star playing his guitar with his teeth, as he would go on to do on that night’s show

Admittedly, this isn’t a huge exhibit, covering three walls of just one room of the enormous museum’s Theatre and Performance collection, and the majorty of the images are familiar, face-on portrait-style snaps. Yet, accompanied by top ’60s and ’70s pop/ rock tunes as it is, the display makes for a cosy and diverting way to spend half-an-hour or 45 minutes, as well as throwing up one or two interesting tid-bits (TOTP effectively invented glam rock thanks to early ’70s guests wearing increasingly outrageous costumes to stand out from each other).

It’ll surely bringing a smile to almost any visitor’s face too. This is British TV history in front of you – very accessible TV that had no agenda aside from providing universal entertainment and dads with the occasional eye-candy that was delectable dance troupe Pan’s People (they too get a look-in here with a satisfyingly big image).

One man arm-band: a post-Beatles John Lennon snapped on his own from the 1970s

For his part, Manchester-born Goodwin started out as a photographer following the Second World War and, thanks to his success as Top Of The Pops‘ in-house snapper, became a freelance shooter for major bands as well as football and boxing stars. Now 85, more of his images can be poured over in the coffee table book My Generation: The Glory Years of British Rock – Photographs by Harry Goodwin, on sale both in the V&A shop and here.

All in all then, I certainly recommend this exhibition; it’s ideal if you happen to find yourself in the Smoke and are in a whimsical, nostalgic mood. Plus, on the way out you can examine the remains of a guitar owned by The Who‘s Pete Townshend, broken on stage during a performance as he had a wont to do – talk about my generation; well, the generation before mine, if you’re being precise.

‘Harry Goodwin: The Glory Years of British Rock 1964-73’ runs free of charge at the V&A Museum until August 30 and will then transfer to the Grundy Art Gallery, Blackpool, from November 20 – January 8 2011