The sardonic Don: Happy 60th birthday, Bill Murray
Raising a glass to a rascal: Bill Murray has delighted public and critics alike for years with both comic and arty brilliance – often awesomely off-kilter but never lost in translation
Brimming with talent, dripping with sarcasm, often hipping it up and always seeming a little weird, Bill Murray has been officially Bill-Murraying for 60 years – well, as of yesterday, to be precise – so happy birth-and-one-day, Bill.
A reluctant film star following his huge success as the wonderfully wry Dr Peter Venkman in über-hit Ghostbusters (1984), Murray had always had aspirations of making it as a serious film actor rather than as one of Hollywood’s golden comedy crowd of the ’80s. Yet, his humour chops were well used and received throughout that decade. He played an obssessive golf course groundsman in Caddyshack (1980), a wisecracking army recruit in Stripes (1981), a pretentious actor roommate in Tootsie (1982), was perfectly cast as a modern-day Scrooge in, er, Scrooged (1988), reprised Venkman in Ghostbusters II (1989) and found genuine public and critical acclaim as a weatherman repeating the same day over and over in the eponymous Groundhog Day (1993).
The fifth of nine children in a poor family, Murray grew up in a suburb of Chicago and attended a Jesuit university in Colorado – before leaving after being arrested on marijuana charges. Following this, he drifted into Chicago’s Second City improvisational comedy troupe (he’d previously played in a rock band), which led him to The National Lampoon Radio Hour, itself in turn leading him to being offered a contract on the legendary Saturday Night Live TV show in 1976, following the departure of Chevy Chase. Eventually, of course, he and early SNL alumni Dan Aykroyd and John Belushi (for whom the Venkman role was originally written) would follow Chase to Hollywood.
“Movie acting suits me because I only need to be good for ninety seconds at a time” ~ Bill Murray
After an attempt at serious film fare in The Razor’s Edge (1984) – it absolutely bombed – Murray didn’t try (or, perhaps more likely, wasn’t hired for the such) again for several years. However, artistic success finally came his way in the ’90s, first with roles in indie gangster comedy Mad Dog And Glory (1983), then Tim Burton effort Ed Wood (1994) and sexy mock-thriller Wild Things (1998). In recent years he’s carved out an enviable niche as one of the actors that weird and sometimes wonderful director Wes Anderson falls back on for his flicks, with appearances in Rushmore (1998), The Royal Tenenbaums (2001), The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou (2004) and The Darjeeling Limited (2007) – for which he’s received hefty critical praise.
Sadly, he missed out on the biggest prize of all – an Oscar – having won every other award in sight for his outstandingly well observed performance as a washed-up Hollywood star who re-discovers his soul in the Japan-set Lost In Translation (2003). He lost out to fellow ’80s icon Sean Penn, but was clearly the popular choice, as referenced on the night when, straight after his loss, the ceremony’s host Billy Crystal announced ‘We still love you, Bill’.
As if to underline his immense popularity, he’s even managed to get away with literally playing himself in major movies – first alongside Bugs Bunny and co. in Space Jam (1996) and then in last year’s Zombieland, in one scene of which he sat down with the film’s protagonists to watch himself in Ghostbusters.
So here’s to surely the driest dude ever to have glittered among Hollywood’s glitterati; he’s made us cheer, laugh and maybe sometimes almost cry on numerous occasions – I may be a day late, and so it’s a bit off-kilter, I know, but happy birthday, Bill. Actually, knowing him, that well-wishing might well be right up his street. 
Looking good: a roster of rare movie posters
Posters. At their best, they can serve as both a canny advertising tool and a satisfying work of art. And this collection, a score of, methinks, some of the very best lesser known film posters from the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s, is no exception. Among them are unusual but more than worthwhile efforts for big-name flicks, and some outstanding ones for less well recalled movies. Either way, for me, they all deserve posting here at George’s Journal.
Don’t forget to CLICK on the images for full size – and on the links for more information.
~~~
You Only Live Twice (1967)/ for USA market
(Above)
First up, a poster from a Bond film. And why not? It’s hard to think of any 007 escapade that hasn’t been promoted by a good one. The above one’s very similar in style, tag-line and use of font to its far more famous sister poster that features Connery in the autogyro Little Nellie amid an air battle with pesky SPECTRE helicopters. However, this ‘un’s surely just as good, its alternative design featuring Bond inside the villain’s volcanic lair; the hero bedecked in a dinner suit and at that ridculous angle, with the deep red colour behind him, all lending the thing a somewhat bizarre and sinister feel. The result? An exciting poster that can’t fail to entice one to see its film.
~~~
It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)/ for USA market
Perfectly capturing the spirit of its madcap caper of a movie, this effort is a classic – and all too rare – cartoon-based film poster. Truth be told, I’ve never been a huge fan of the flick, I’m sure I’ve only seen it in snatches, but I’ve always greatly admired this artwork. Seemingly featuring every one of its cacophany of a cast (check out all those guest stars!) as figures rushing after a suitcase of money – as in the movie – notice that every one of them, including Spencer Tracy at the front there, have cartoonishly slightly over-sized heads. In fact, the whole effect isn’t dissimilar to trying to find film stars in a Where’s Wally? landscape. Clever, indeed.
~~~
Blow Up (1966)/ for Italian market
An unforgettable, iconic image on a bold, bright red background. This poster’s simplicity is its genius – and it’s so genius it almost aches. Blow Up, the legendary Antonioni’s only foray into UK filmmaking, is an undeservedly still under-seen classic capsule of the Swinging Sixties and, most specifically, the London fashion scene of that era. And this poster perfectly encapsulates – and therefore sells – all that the film is. The design also came out on a yellow and green background, but the red is, probably for obvious reasons, the best.
Further reading:
http://doubleonothing.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/blowup-antonionis-seminal-60s-film-is-no-let-down/
~~~
Fantastic Voyage (1966)/ for USA market
And here we have what may be, to my mind, the greatest ever ‘teaser’ poster. Fantastic Voyage is a rather stodgy sci-fi flick featuring a Jules Verne-like voyage inside the human body (the ’80s adventure Innerspace was its remake). And, in their infinite wisdom, how did 20th Century Fox announce to – let’s be honest – male moviegoers that this film was ‘coming soon’? That’s right, they slapped up a picture of an ‘implied’ nude Raquel Welch (one of the film’s stars, at least) and called it a film poster. A pin-up teasing on a teaser poster? Genius. If that wouldn’t get the punters in, surely nothing would. One interesting sidenote, though, is that that this poster clearly displays how the social mores of the States – and, indeed, elsewhere – were definitely relaxing by the mid-’60s. And then some…
~~~
Un Homme Et Une Femme (A Man And A Woman) (1966)/ for French market
A lesson in ’60s European cool here. This features the exact same idea of filling a canvas with on-set stills of different sizes and shapes that was used for a major poster of the great, similarly French/ New Wave-made À Bout de Souffle (Breathless), released six years earlier. However, despite the same design and the latter flick’s status as an unadulterated classic, I must admit I prefer this poster. There’s something so unquestionably cool about it. Two trendy film stars cast as beautiful lovers – one of whom’s a racing driver – caught in sepia moments in time. It’s very French, it’s very nouvelle vague, and it’s very cool.
~~~
Camelot (1967)/ for USA market
For me, Warners’ cinematic adaptation of Camelot is a highly underrated movie musical – it’s right up there with the likes of Oliver! and Mary Poppins – but many seem to disagree with me. What surely isn’t up for question, though, is that its poster is a stonker. Released, as it was, right slap-bang in the middle of the ‘free love’ age, the film’s stylings, tones and costumes take influence from the times, and, reflecting this, the poster does too. In fact, you could say it goes further. It’s not quite psychedelic, but its a whirlygig of colour and movement and, at its focal point, Vanessa Redgrave’s Guinevere is represented as a hippie angel with free-flowing, wild red hair – both in the main image and the smaller one in the foreground. Indeed, if a ’60s makeover of King Arthur’s court – featuring David Hemmings as a suitably impish but cool Mordred – appeals to you, then I heartily recommend this flick.
~~~
Cool Hand Luke (1967)/ for USA market
By way of contrast with Camelot‘s poster, this one’s artwork is positively gaudy – indeed, there’s something almost ’70s about the repeated cut-out silhouette shape in red and cream it deploys. More funky than hippie, certainly. But it’s confident, assertive, brassy and cool as hell, very much in keeping with Paul Newman’s Luke himself, a one-man machine of defiance on a chain-gang in America’s Deep South. As the tag-line reads, it simply screams exhilarating non-conformity.
~~~
The Fox (1967)/ for USA market
A curate’s egg, this one. The film is a generally forgotten adaptation of a D H Lawrence novella written in 1923, but you’ll surely remember the poster from the second you clap eyes on it. Such a simple idea too – reflect the movie’s plot with its sapphic overtones by interlocking two women’s heads, and suggest the man involved with them both – and the dangerous ménage à trois that creates – by the axe he holds. Produced as this poster was in 1967, note the hint of psychedelic design in the right-hand head’s flowing locks.
~~~
If…. (1968)/ for UK market
A terrific example of an image and tag-line working in perfect harmony on a poster, this one is an all-time classic of UK cinema – and the film certainly ain’t no slouch either. Also, a closer look at the grenade will reveal its individual sections are cleverly made up stills from the film (a la Un Homme Et Une Femme above), while the classy, yet big, bold two-worded title is a terrific use of typeface. This poster is deliberately but subtly disturbing – rebellion was in the air in the late ’60s and that’s exactly what the intelligent If…. was all about.
~~~
The Thomas Crown Affair (1968)/ for USA market
Surely you’d have to be rather an ignorant retro enthusiast not to be aware of the original Thomas Crown Affair? Steve McQueen; Faye Dunaway’s super-long eyelashes; The Windmills Of My Mind etc. But have you seen this poster of said flick before? Perhaps you have, but perhaps you haven’t. By perfectly mirroring what it’s supposed to promote, it too is a visual tour de force. Effortlessly cool and hugely sexy (look at how Dunaway is almost biting McQueen’s lip there), it terrifically reflects the film’s memorable split-screen technique and, in doing so, like the film again, in each smaller box it makes use of close-ups of the main image and focuses almost indiscriminately but appealingly on anatomical details. It even coolly rocks that shocking pink.
~~~
Where Eagles Dare (1968)/ for USA market
So what’s so great about this poster then, I hear you all cry? Well, because just like the flick from which it comes, its greatness lies in its utter ridiculousness. The design of the image is very Bond film poster- like, and not a million miles away from the style adopted for posters for the likes of The Guns Of Navarone (1960), but none of those such posters would claim that two men and one woman were capable of ‘winning World War II’, especially because they’d just decided to! It’s silly, grandiose and a load of nonsense, but it’s nicely designed, very engaging and a whole lot of fun.
~~~
Downhill Racer (1969)/ for USA market
An example, if ever there were one, of a poster that’s better than the movie (trust me, Robert Redford looks neither cool or sexy in skiing garb), this effort’s also a great example of how cutting edge, manipulated images to be found in magazine ads in the ’60s, by the end of the decade, began to be employed by Hollywood for their big flicks. There’s little pretence here about trying to fool the viewer into thinking this is a ‘natural’ image crafted by its designer; anyone who takes a glance at it ‘can see the joins’, as it were, where the scissors have been got out and individual images moved around and put in place. Yet the effect is damn cool – even if , when you break it down, it’s all a bit hokey (the tagline reads: ‘How fast must a man go to get from where he’s at?’), and yet that hokeyness just adds to its charm for me. Think the movie bombed, mind.
~~~
Hello, Dolly! (1969)/ for USA market
As the poster reveals, Michael Crawford of Some Mothers Do ‘Ave ‘Em fame was in Hello, Dolly!, but there’s nothing Frank Spencer-esque about its poster. While I’m unlikely to send flowers anymore – or, to be precise, ever – to Ms Streisand for her musicals, this one’s artwork is indeed top stuff. Again, there’s more than a hint of psychedelia – in fact, the copious foliage of Barb’s bonnet is blooming with it – and the bright colours are immediately appealing. But it’s greatness surely lies in the fact the oval-shaped centre, containing all the colour and surrounded by the lively title in bold typeface, is set on a completely white background. There’s something very modernist to it all, seems to me, and something very effective too.
~~~
The Italian Job (1969)/ for USA market
In all fairness, if a film poster is supposed to sell its product by smartly and – ideally – subconsciously sowing the seeds in someone’s mind of what it’ll be like, then this poster pretty much fails. Instead of suggesting to US moviegoers that The Italian Job was a hip, sunny, very British crime caper, it surely put in their minds a stylish, heavy mafia-related heist thriller. All right, the movie’s a bit like that latter description, but that’s not how anyone would choose to describe it, is it? So the big question is why have I included this poster in this list then? Because it’s cool as hell, that’s why. It’s one of those products that makes you wonder whether any decade managed to produce anything remotely as cool as anything that came out of the ’60s. Sharp, sleek, witty and stylish, it really shouldn’t be a film poster – hell, it should be a ’60s Pan paperback cover. It’s art and that’s that.
~~~
Carry On Henry (1971)/ for UK market
All right, yes, while this one doesn’t exactly deserve to be in this company for its artistic merit, it surely makes up for it with its fun and ebullience. And for that outstanding tag-line. Plus, there’s something appealing – and fittingly childishly comic – about the characters with their over-sized heads again (a staple with Carry On posters, in fact). If anything, they’re reminiscent of toby jugs – like the Carry On films themselves, another great British institution.
~~~
The Candidate (1972)/ for USA market
The product of an era of intense politicial cynicism, nay disillusionment (what with McGovern’s flattening by Nixon and the subsequent Watergate scandal), The Candidate featured Robert Redford (again) as a no-hoper running for office merely to espouse on a platform, but becoming corrupted once he had a shot at winning. It’s a flick lighter than, say, All The President’s Men, but has bite nonetheless. But what about the poster? Well, all this is wonderfully suggested by Redford blowing a bubble in front of the Stars and Stripes – creating both a devil-may-care attitude and a tone totally at odds with the earnestness and augustness with which politics is supposed to be infused. A very ’70s film poster and an unforgettable image. The line at the bottom tops it off nicely, indeed.
~~~
Saturday Night Fever (1977)/ for USA market
While hinting at none of the grit, edge and darkness that makes The ‘Fever the decent film it is under all the disco, this is nonetheless, to my mind, a poster that’s an absolutely doozie. Why? Because with the iconic shining, metallic title typeface, the sharp as hell tagline and the mirror-like half-repeat of the unforgettable main image, it sizzles with energy and electricity. In short, back in ’77 it would have jumped out at you and grabbed you by the balls. Nowadays, yes, it may well seemd damned tasteless, but surely its effectiveness as simply a poster advertising a film is unquestionable.
~~~
The Empire Strikes Back (1980)/ for USA market
There are, of course, many, many great posters produced for the original Star Wars trilogy, but staying true to the ethos of this list, I’ve picked here a lesser known – perhaps the least known – one. What I love about it is it’s simplicity. For me, it’s a perfect teaser poster. Even three years on from the original Star Wars, you’d surely be forgiven for wondering how they’d be able to equal – let alone top – that, but of course they did with Empire – and this poster may just have given you an inkling they were going to. The message is plain, the Rebels’ cause is not over; the Empire is striking back. Not only are we told that, but we’re presented with the forbidding helmet of Darth Vader set against a pitch black background of space (albeit with some stars). The stark message hits you like a sledgehammer – just as well then that loveable, brilliant old Yoda the Muppet popped up in the flick to soothe adults’ fears and delight the kiddies.
~~~
Excalibur (1981)/ for USA market
Make no mistake, Excalibur is an ambitious film, and its poster ably hints at that. Suggested in this beautiful artwork , with its light beams created by swords and glittering armour, dramatic poses and expressions and magical-looking creatures is all the luxurious, melodramatic and shimmering beauty on show in the movie itself. Moreover, the glossy texture of the image even seems to reference the enigmatic nature of the film’s tone – never quite attainable, much like myths (and especially those of King Arthur and Camelot) themselves.
~~~
The Goonies (1985)/ for USA market
A light, fun poster to finish on then – and one that could only have come out of the ’80s. Unashamedly inspired by the fantasy heroism-themed artwork of the Indiana Jones posters (and indeed created by the artist behind many of those classics, Drew Struzan), this effort for The Goonies struck a big chord with me back in the day and I’m surprised you don’t see it more – I would have though the fun, campy image would have proved endurably memorable (after all, everyone remembers the Crocodile Dundee poster in which Paul Hogan bends back the skyscrapers of New York – and that’s a very similar ‘visual gag’ in tone and style to this one’s). Anyway, this poster for me is tops, referring perfectly as it does to the adventure, action, fantasy and mild peril throughout a flick that’s proved inescapable entertainment for kids of the ’80s – at all ages.
So, folks, thanks for looking – and reading my reporting on posters of years past for posterity. 
Manhattan transfer: Mad Men’s UK return (September 8)
Big fish in the Big Apple: Don Draper and the rest of the new Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce team reveal how – and how not – to get ahead in advertising in the fourth season of Mad Men
You know, in recent years, if I’m being honest, there’s been few dramas out there in Tellyland that have been up my street from the start and kept me loyally watching to the finish. Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip for sure (based on the strength of The West Wing – the same guy created both). Ashes To Ashes definitely (conceived by the same peeps behind Life On Mars). And that’s about it. Oh… but of course, how could I forget? Then there’s Mad Men.
Created by Matt Weiner, one of the chaps behind the hugely successful The Sopranos, US cable channel AMC’s Mad Men – for the uninitiated – is focused around the work and people of the fictitious Madison Avenue ad agency Sterling Cooper. Set in early to mid-’60s, it’s shamelessly stylish, refreshingly intelligent and unfalteringly captivating. It’s also unrepentantly un-PC – or, at least, the world it presents us is – what with characters smoking like chimneys and drinking like fish, executives slapping secretaries’ backsides, husbands cheating on wives without a thought of remorse and a homosexual character compromised because he’s gay. It shows the era in which it’s set fairly honestly then.
But, for me, best of all, it’s genuinely grown-up drama. The writing, acting and directing is consistently excellent, offering up three-dimensional characters, crisp, acerbic dialogue and constant food for thought – while passing through the 1960 Presidential election, the Cuban Missile Crisis and Kennedy’s assassination, it examines the beatnik ethos versus corporate capitalism, the hobo versus the ‘American Dream’-style family man laying down his roots, and a chauvinistic society discovering early feminism. Indeed, moments experienced by ad man extraordinaire Don Draper and would-be highflyer account handler Pete Campbell showcase the best existential angst you’ll see this side of a Stephen Poliakoff drama.
Meeting the Beats: Ad man Don mingles with beatniks Midge and Roy in the first season
The retro and artistic appeal isn’t just limited to the creators and actors, though. For any lover of mid-century modern design, Mad Men is interior decor and clothing porn. The Madison Avenue office interiors are beautifully and starkly seductive (much like the dark behaviour of the characters), and the suits and dresses on show as sharp and eye-catching as Errol Flynn in a sword fight. Moreover, the opening credits clearly nod to the credits and poster design created by the legendary Saul Bass for Hitchcock’s North By Northwest (1959) and Vertigo (1958), respectively.
And, if a would-be viewer required any further reason to give this series’ fourth season a whirl, then be assured it’s never been in a more promising and exciting position. In the real world, just last week it won the Best TV Drama Golden Globe award for its third season, its third in a row – it’s also won the corresponding Emmy award three times. And, in its own world, at the end of the third season (warning: here be spoilers) its eponymous ad agency had folded, a new one created from its ashes and the main character started life as a single man. Make no mistake, the fourth season is awaited with greatly baited breath by fans.
Plus, if you’re still not convinced, consider the fact Mad Men features two of America’s latest sex symbols, James Bond lookalike Jon Hamm (ladies’ man-and-a-half Don Draper) and the irresistibly lovely Christina Hendricks (voluptuous office vixen Joan Holloway). If that advert won’t draw you to the Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce agency, then you’re a bull-headed, stuck-in-the-mud client indeed. 
The fourth season of Mad Men begins in the UK tonight on BBC4 at 10pm.
~~~
Further reading:
http://www.amctv.com/originals/madmen
http://doubleonothing.wordpress.com/2010/09/08/mad-world-the-production-design-of-mad-men
~~~
Kate Bush: Wow
Talent…
… These are the lovely ladies and gorgeous girls of eras gone by whose beauty, ability, electricity and all-round x-appeal deserve celebration and – ahem – salivation here at George’s Journal…
~~~
Beautiful, brilliant, original, enigmatic, reclusive and a wee bit weird, there’d never been anyone quite like Kate Bush, and there probably never will be again. She set pop music on its head and sent mensfolk’s pulses racing. Her eclectic and sophisticated sounds were huge in both the ’70s and ’80s and she didn’t look half bad along with it – and for these reasons she’s an unquestionable shoe-in for the Talent corner of this blog.
~~~
Profile
Name: Catherine ‘Kate’ Bush
Nationality: English
Profession: Musician
Born: 30 July 1958, Bexleyheath, Kent
Height: 5ft 3in
Known for: Producing and performing arty yet mainstream music predominantly in the ’70s and ’80s, including the albums The Kick Inside (1978), Lionheart (1978) and the hugely acclaimed Hounds Of Love (1985), as well as the hit singles Wuthering Heights (1978), The Man With The Child In His Eyes (1978), Babooshka (1980), Running Up That Hill (1985), Cloudbursting (1985) and Don’t Give Up (1986) – a duet with Peter Gabriel.
Strange but true: Sound engineers constructed for her an early headset mic out of a coathanger and a radio microphone, as she wished to sing and dance at the same time during her six-week-long The Tour Of Life tour in 1979, in which she went through a total of 17 costume changes for each show.
Peak of fitness: Alternatively playing with a double bass and dressed in Amazonian warrior-like get-up in the strange and not a little suggestive Babooshka video
~~~
CLICK on images for full-size
Playlist: Listen, my friends! ~ September
In the words of Moby Grape… listen, my friends! Yes, it’s the (hopefully) monthly playlist presented by George’s Journal just for you good people.
There may be one or two classics to be found here dotted in among different tunes you’re unfamiliar with or never heard before – or, of course, you may’ve heard them all before. All the same, why not sit back, listen away and enjoy…
CLICK on the song titles to hear them
~~~
The Moody Blues ~ Om
Steppenwolf ~ Magic Carpet Ride
Simon And Garfunkel ~ El Condor Pasa (If I Could)
John Lennon ~ God
Badfinger ~ Day After Day
The Who ~ Sparks
Slade ~ How Does It Feel?
David Bowie ~ Speed Of Life
Billy Joel ~ Scenes From An Italian Restaurant
Earth, Wind & Fire ~ September
Journey ~ Wheel In The Sky
Roxy Music ~ Same Old Scene
Patti Labelle ~ Stir It Up
Nowhere Man?: Lennon Naked (2010) ~ Review
Directed by: Edmund Coulthard
Starring: Christopher Eccleston, Christopher Fairbank, Naoko Mori, Claudie Blakley, Rory Kinnear, Michael Colgan, Adrian Bower, Andrew Scott
Screenplay by: Robert Jones
UK; 82 minutes; Colour/ b&w; Certificate: 15
~~~
What with the ever increasing deluge of dreck clogging up our telly screens these days, I must admit the BBC4 TV channel has become something of a refuge for me. With its mixture of arts, historical and science programmes, as well as smart original drama, it may just be the best channel around (sad to report, though, it’s only available in the UK and Northern Ireland, you non-home-nations people out there).
So, it was with curiosity and expectation I came upon a repeat the other night of this fictional retelling of John Lennon’s life between the years of 1967 and ’71. This period of his life is, for sure, a big canvas to cover requiring both broad and subtle brushstrokes, but if any TV drama could pull it off, surely it would be one comissioned by BBC4, wouldn’t it?
But did it pull it off? Well, yes and no. For me, what Lennon Naked gets both right and wrong is its attention to, or rather emphasis on, detail – the angel and the devil’s in the detail, if you will. So, first up, the good. The painstaking work that has gone into making the drama feel like it’s right out of the late ’60s and early ’70s is all there – period detail including the fashions, furnishings, vehicles and streetscapes is all present and correct (you really feel like you’re in Lennon’s world, swaggering hippiedom collides with the straight-laced stockbroker London suburbs, where he set up home, or rather mansion, with wife Cynthia and son Julian).
Add to that the casting, Rory Kinnear is pretty much spot on with his restrained, softly spoken Brian Epstein (his early, ’64-set scenes with Lennon nattily filmed in monochrome, reminiscent of A Hard Day’s Night), while Claudie Blakley delivers a nicely balanced Cynthia, and Michael Colgan and Adrian Bower convince in believable interpretations of Beatles alumni Derek Taylor and Pete Shotton, respectively.
Moreover, there’s absolutely no doubt that the esteemed acting talent that is Eccleston (former Doctor Who and star of the outstanding Our Friends In The North – the last great British serial drama) relishes getting his teeth stuck into bringing Lennon back to life, warts and all. His performance is at its best when recreating John’s sardonic demeanour, full of customary caustic wit (thanks to writer Robert Jones giving him Lennon-esque dialogue that sounds true to the ear – Fan on the street: “Kiss me, John!”/ Lennon (indicating Brian Epstein): “Kiss ‘im – ‘e’s never been kissed by womankind… or unkind”). The accent too isn’t bad, even if the actor’s own Salford twinge comes out through the scouse once or twice. And, naturally, Eccleston does very well in peeling back the layers of Lennon’s glass onion – bringing out the existential, drug-addled darkness at the heart of the man’s soul that much of the music he produced during this era (especially in his solo material) suggested or even spelt out was there.
However, at the same time, I’d argue that it’s here that this film gets it wrong. And, to be fair, it’s not necessarily Eccleston’s fault. He’s an actor who’s outstanding in expressing angst, it’s just a pity that the production seems intent in pretty much only expressing this. The ’67-’71 period in Lennon’s life was turbulent, of course, there’s a lot of gloom there to draw on: troubled reconnection with his father Freddie (a fine Christopher Fairclough) – around which the drama pivots, leaving his wife and son, drug addiction, ‘primal scream’ therapy and, far from least of all, the break-up of The Beatles. And the drama revels in it all, as Lennon escapes reality in a transcedental-like dip in his swimming pool, lies strung-out in a dingy bathroom’s bath, gets busted for drugs and (apparently) takes the psychological blame for the Fabs’ break-up. Yet, all that surely was only part of the story, wasn’t it?
Sure, Lennon’s meeting and burgeoning relationship with Yoko is shown – indeed, much is given over to it – but it hardly presents this side of the story as the beautiful discovery, nay saving grace, it obviously was for the protagonist. Instead, it goes down the easy route of public perception of the time – the tone of their scenes is together more awkward and freakish than fitting and blissful. Yes, Jonh’s finding Yoko precipitated his divorce from Cynthia (and there’s a strong scene devoted to this), but it was also a huge step for Lennon himself, even if he went through heroin addiction at the same time.
For me, then, this approach is somewhat cynical, let alone unoriginal really, and casts Lennon in the tragic hero role (especially with its emphasis on abandonment by his parents); conveniently completing his story, as it does, at the point when he and Yoko left Britain for New York where their happy years together began and John probably felt at home for the first time.
Fair enough then, this flick doesn’t get all schmaltzy over Imagine and the such like, but with a little more imagination methinks it could have presented its subject in a fairer, more balanced manner than merely the heavily toubled, unpleasant and far from Fab chap it offers us up instead. 
For a brief time, you can watch Lennon Naked on the BBC iplayer (UK and Northern Ireland only) here, or it can be purchased here.
Tartan titan: Happy 80th birthday, Sean Connery
Muscle beach: Sean Connery showing he’s still got it at the Cannes Film Festival in 1999
He’s consistently considered the best Bond, he’s clearly one of Britain’s greatest films stars and he’d be the only possible candidate to become (the latest) King of Scotland should his home country ever become independent… yes, today, my friends, the redoubtable, indefatigable, undeniable Sean Connery is 80 years young.
And, really, when you think about it, it’s no surprise this Scottish institution has reached that very milestone – he’s been an international insitution for longer than many of us have been alive. It was way back in 1962 when Connery debuted as 007 in Dr No, the opening adventure of the Eon film series, and, of course, he went on to make another five of them, From Russia With Love (1963), Goldfinger (1964), Thunderball (1965), You Only Live Twice (1967) and Diamonds Are Forever (1971).
Bond put him on the map for sure, although he had something of a career before that role came along, taking lead duties (and singing) in Disney musical Darby O’Gill And The Little People (1961) and a supporting role (not singing) opposite Lana Turner in melodrama Another Time, Another Place (1958). Indeed, while making the latter film Turner’s gangster boyfriend Johnny Stompanato became jealous of Connery spending so much time with his much better half, so pointed a gun at him – his response was to grab the gun, twist Stompanto’s wrist and force him to flee. It wasn’t the first time the surly Scot’s anger and more violent side would surface. He would later publicly state that, in the right circumstances, he believed it acceptable to hit women and, since their marriage, his first wife has accused him of physical abuse. More Irn Bruiser than squeaky clean, you might say.
“Unlike many tattoos, his [Connery’s] were not frivolous – his tattoos reflect two of his lifelong commitments: his family and Scotland … One tattoo is a tribute to his parents and reads ‘Mum and Dad’, and the other is self explanatory, ‘Scotland Forever’.” ~ The Official Website Of Sir Sean Connery
Conners then has had a controversial time of it over the years and, by all accounts, didn’t particularly enjoy his time in Bondage. Becoming annoyed by the focus on gadgets and spectacle over more realistic espionage, he tired of making the spy films (mid-’60s ‘Bondmania’ and the intense media attention it brought him far from helped either). By the early ’70s, he had to be lured back with a paycheck of $1million (at that time, an enormous front-end deal for a film star) and contributions to his newly set-up Scottish education fund, in order to make his final appearance. He did however play 007 one more time in the ‘unofficial’ film, 1983’s Never Say Never Again. Like all the others, it too was a mega-hit.
Post-Bond, that wasn’t the only unusual choice he took in his career either. There was a cowboy opposite Bridget Bardo in Shalako (1968), an apocalyptic leader in Zardoz (1974), a space sheriff in Outland (1981), an Egyptian-cum-Spanish eternal warrior in Highlander (1986) and an Amazon-based doctor with a long ponytail in Medicine Man (1992).
Yet alongside the misses, there’s also been hits of real quality – he was directed by Hitchcock in Marnie (1964), directed by John Huston and starred opposite Michael Caine in The Man Who Would Be King (1975), won a BAFTA Award for his role as a monk detective in The Name Of The Rose (1986), played a Russian submarine captain in The Hunt For Red October (1990), romanced Audrey Hepburn in Robin And Marian (1976) and Michelle Pfeiffer in The Russia House (1990) and won every award under the sun (including an Oscar) for a bombastic, hard-hitting turn in Brian De Palma’s classy and stylish The Untouchables (1987). All that and, of course, he was sought out by Steven Spielberg and George Lucas to play Indy’s dad (thanks to the logic that only James Bond could play that role) in Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade (1989).
Nowadays Connery is retired from acting – citing Hollywood is run by ‘idiots’ – and seems to spend much of his time backing Scottish nationalist projects and calling for the country’s independence from the UK. And, despite this political stance, like the man who replaced him as 007, he was knighted by the Queen herself in July 2000.
All in all then, not bad for a former milkman, lorry driver and coffin polisher from Edinburgh. Indeed, what with his career resurgence in the ’80s, he was even voted ‘Sexiest Man Alive’ at the age of 59 – and who would argue with that? What man would argue with all the world’s women, after all?
So, on this most distinguished of days in his life, let’s raise a glass of scotch to the man, the legend, the Scotsman forever, Sir Sean Connery. The man who would be king? Nah, more like the man who’s always been king. 
~~~
The ten greatest Connery moments
(CLICK on the links!)
10. Highlander (1986) ~ ‘Greetings’
9. A Bridge Too Far (1977) ~ ‘Do you think they know something we don’t?’
8. Robin and Marian (1976) ~ The showdown
7. Time Bandits (1981) ~ ‘It’s evil!’
6. Goldfinger (1964) ~ ‘Man talk’
5. Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade (1989) ~ ‘I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne’
4. The Man Who Would Be King (1975) ~ ‘Can you forgive me?’
3. The Untouchables (1987) ~ ‘What are you prepared to do?’
2. From Russia With Love (1963) ~ ‘Old man’
1. Dr No (1962) ~ ‘Bond, James Bond’
Review: My Word Is My Bond – The Autobiography ~ Roger Moore
Author: Roger Moore, with Gareth Owen
Year: 2008
Publisher: Michael O’Mara Books (UK)/ HarperCollins (US)
ISBN: 9781843173182 (UK)/ 0061673889 (US)
~~~
James Bond. Simon Templar. Lord Brett Sinclair. Tongue-in-cheek, old-school, British screen institution. Everybody knows Sir Rog? Or do they?
Well, admittedly, reading My Word Is My Bond – The Autobiography is unlikely to change your perception or rough view of the legendary actor much, but it will certainly give you a broader and deeper appreciation of his career and life. Written and published to coincide with Moore’s 80th birthday, it’s heavy on detail – as every decent biography should be – but also showcases Sir Rog’s trademark and effortless wit, wisdom and irresistibly saucy sense of humour. And, if you’re an admirer of the man (surely most likely if you’re considering reading the book), then that’s definitely a good thing.
Be sure too that, chronicling his life from humble beginnings in Stockwell, South London, and as a budding theatre actor, then the years as a contract player with MGM and Warners, through TV work on Ivanhoe, Maverick, The Saint and The Persuaders!, and finally to Bond and beyond, there’s many a golden anecdote to be savoured between its pages.
Take, for example, ex-Marine Lee Marvin – co-star on adventure film Shout At The Devil – putting a stuntman out of work just to prove he could still swim through a raging sea, and Christopher Lee singing opera in Italian before bed each night while staying in tiny shacks on an uninhabited Thai island during the filming of The Man With The Golden Gun. Not forgetting Stewart Granger’s (Sir Rog’s one-time idol) reaction to bus-waiting folk bursting into laughter as the former’s suitcase breaks open on the street – another unquestionably candid and bawdy highlight.
However, if you’re looking for warts-and-all exposés behind Moore’s time in Bondage or other intriguing Hollywood projects he was involved in, then this read won’t be for you. For instance, the controversy generated by the filming of 1974’s Gold in apartheid-era South Africa is glossed over in favour of recollections of how a difficult production was pulled off. Plus, as admitted from the off it won’t be, the autobiography has little interest in bad-mouthing people of whom Moore hasn’t fond memories, and what with his reportedly tempestuous marriage with singer Dorothy Squires, there must be a few.
Yet, given the author’s easy-going, playful and friendly personality, it’s a good decision – the book would surely be the worst for any out-of-character bile. Instead, the tone is cosily conversational and jovially informative, the subject often humbly suggesting he’s a ‘ponce’ for taking on projects for money rather than artistic merit and doubting his own acting ability – both of which underline this is a Hollywood legend refreshingly free of ego. And that’s in spite of constant name-dropping, which comes across as disarmingly interesting rather than narcissistic; one instinctively believes Moore’s claims to have been friends with a good number of yesteryear’s steller screen names. Why wouldn’t he have been?
Indeed, Sir Rog has, of course, been a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador for the past 20 years and, noting that as an elderly man he still undertakes this globe-trotting role with gusto, it’s clear he’s a genuinely kind-hearted chap who, having years ago landed on his feet with a successful acting career and the privileged life that brought him, is only too pleased – if you will – ‘to give something back’. Indeed, concerning this era of his life as it does, the last leg of the book’s journey makes for quite the poignant and thoughtful insight.
One revealing tidbit is that it was Audrey Hepburn who persuaded Sir Rog to become involved in UNICEF, nagging him to speak at an event in May 1991, and following her untimely death in 1993, he felt he had no alternative than to carry on her work by essentially taking over her role with the organisation. Clearly then, this is admirable stuff and, clearly, like practically any man would, Sir Rog found it impossible to turn down a request from the angelic Audrey.
So, if you fancy a little enlightenment on the worlds of UK and US television and filmmaking from the ’50s through to the ’80s, sprinkled with genuine stardust, from one of the great entertainers, then My Word Is My Bond may be right up your street. My word, I’d go as far as vouching my Martini on it. 
My Word Is My Bond – The Autobiography is available to buy here.























































































